SELF-SUPPORTING FOLDED SHEET MATERIAL, FILTER ELEMENTS, AND METHODS
This application is being filed on 8 Apr. 2015, as a PCT International Patent Application and claims priority to U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/977,469, filed Apr. 9, 2014, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. This disclosure relates to sheet material that is folded to maintain a degree of structural integrity and while the disclosure is aimed primarily at pleated filtration media used in media packs, filter elements, and methods of their manufacture, the disclosure can also be applied in other instances, where a folded sheet material can benefit from the structural integrity, flexibility and resilience offered by the present disclosure. Permeable sheets of filtration media are used widely to remove contaminants from fluid streams and in order to achieve optimal performance of the filtration media, the surface of the sheet that is exposed to the fluid stream needs to be large, but in order to avoid excessive size of filtration elements, the sheets need to fit into small volumes and are typically pleated to maximize the ratios between filtration surfaces exposed to the fluid streams and the overall dimensions of the filtration elements. When exposed to fluid steams, these filtration elements and the permeable sheets in them are exposed to forces from the fluid streams and need to withstand these forces sufficiently to ensure continued acceptable operation of the filter element. In particular, pleated sheets of permeable filtration media are often prone to deflection and adjacent sheets are often too close together or touch and thus prevent a well dispersed flow pattern of the fluid—and reduce the available surface area of the filtration media for loading—a phenomenon known as “masking”. Further, in order to be cost effective, filtration elements made from sheets of permeable filtration media typically do not include structural supports for the filtration media, but rely on the structural integrity of the folded sheets themselves. Pleated filtration media are typically formed from continuous or rolled webs and pleats are formed perpendicular to the “machine” or “reel” direction of the media, i.e. to the continuous direction of the media as it comes from a source, such as a supply reel. Simple alternating “zigzag” pleats are commonly used and are simple to form, but are prone to deflection and masking, especially in cases of deep pleats. Some methods have been proposed to inhibit deflection and/or retain spacing between adjacent pleats, but these methods tend to require complex (and thus costly) manufacturing methods (e.g. because they require adjacent layers of pleated filtration media to be attached together with adhesive), they are not versatile because their geometry is static, and/or they are prone to crushing and collapsing. The present disclosure seeks to address at least some of the challenges mentioned above and in particular to provide elements of folded sheet material with improved structural stiffness, flexibility and compressibility, or maximizing surface area, which can be manufactured cost-effectively. Some techniques used previously include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,683,537 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,522,909, incorporated by reference herein. Pleated media packs for use in filter elements are provided. The media pack includes a section of filtration media folded into pleats; at least some of the pleats having a major pleat depth; the section of filtration media being configured into a tube defining an interior volume, first and second opposite ends; and an opening at the first end; the opening having a diameter; wherein at least some of the pleats at the first end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the first end toward the second end; and at least some of the pleats at the second end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the second end toward the first end. In example aspects, the pleats include major pleats defining the major pleat depth, and minor pleats having a minor pleat depth that is less that the major pleat depth. In example aspects, the major pleats and minor pleats alternate with each other. In example aspects, the major pleats and minor pleats are arranged in a repeating pattern. In example aspects, at least some of the major pleats at the first end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the first end toward the second end. In example aspects, at least some of the minor pleats at the first end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the first end toward the second end. In example aspects, the major pleats and minor pleats at the first end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the first end toward the second end. In example aspects, at least some of the major pleats at the second end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the second end toward the first end. In example aspects, at least some of the minor pleats at the second end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the second end toward the first end. In example aspects, the major pleats and minor pleats at the second end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the second end toward the first end. In example aspects, a ratio of the pleat depth to the opening diameter is greater than 0.1. In example aspects, a ratio of the pleat depth to the opening diameter is not greater than 0.5. In example aspects, a ratio of the pleat depth to the opening diameter is between 0.2 and 0.35. In another aspect, a filter element is provided including a first open end cap secured to the first end of the media pack as characterized above; and a second end cap secured to the second end of the media pack. In example aspects, the second end cap is a closed end cap. In example aspects, the first open end cap defines an outlet opening for an exit of filtered fluid. It is noted that not all the specific features described herein need to be incorporated in an arrangement for the arrangement to have some selected advantage according to the present disclosure. In general, it has been learned that the pressure drop across a filter element is related to the diameter of the outlet of the clean fluid exit hole, when you have filter elements that filter from outside to inside. It has been observed that the performance gains in a filter element rise (performance gains being defined by a decrease in pressure drop), as a ratio of the pleat depth to the diameter of the air outlet increases. It has further been observed that to achieve a longer filter life, more filter media is used, but as more filter media is used by way of increasing the pleat depth, the outlet hole becomes smaller. However, it has also been observed that to get better performance, as measured by less of a pressure drop, one wants to make the outlet size larger. In applying these principles, one example filter element 100 shown in The section of filtration media of the pleated media pack 102 can be configured into a tube defining an interior volume 108 ( The interior volume 108 of the tube is shown as have a circular cross-section, but can have a variety of cross-sectional shapes including oval or racetrack. In the embodiment depicted, the interior volume 108 is conical in shape. In other embodiments, the interior volume 108 can be cylindrical in shape. In As mentioned above, it has been learned that as the ratio of the major pleat depth 106 to the dimension, such as outer diameter (if circular; in other shapes, the appropriate dimension is used) of the outlet opening 116 increases, performance gains of the preferred embodiment as compared to a typical prior art cylindrical element rise, which means the pressure drop decreases. It has been found that a ratio of the major pleat depth to the outer dimension, such as diameter, should be greater than 0.1 to achieve both performance and life advantages. In many implementations, it has been found that the ratio of major pleat depth to outlet dimension (such as diameter) should not exceed 0.5. When exceeding 0.5, in some filtering conditions, it can result in bunched up pleats. In general, it has been learned that a ratio of pleat depth to outlet dimension, such as diameter, of between 0.2-0.35 achieves most benefits of better performance, as measured by the pressure drop. In the element 100 shown in In example embodiments, the pleats 104 include major pleats 124 defining the major pleat depth 106. It has been observed that as the pleat depth 106 increases, the pleat spacing along the outside of the element also increases for a given pleat spacing at the inside diameter. It has been observed that the spacing around the outside of the element does not need to be so widely spaced, so the addition of the minor pleats 126 improves performance by adding more media to the element 100. The pleats 104, in example embodiment illustrated, includes minor pleats 126. The minor pleats 126 have a minor pleat depth 128 ( Various embodiments can be made. In the example embodiment shown in In one or more embodiments, the major pleats 124 and minor pleats 126 can be in a repeating pattern. In one or more embodiments, the major pleats 124 will all have an approximate equal pleat depth to each other. In one or more embodiments, the minor pleats 126 will all have an approximate equal pleat depth to each other. In one or more embodiments, the major pleats 124 and minor pleats 126 can be in a repeating pattern, in which the major pleats 124 will all have an approximate equal pleat depth to each other, and the minor pleats 126 will all have an approximate equal pleat depth to each other. In some of these arrangements, the major pleats 124 and the minor pleats 126 alternate with each other. Attention is directed to In the example illustrated, the inverted section 132 extends from the first end 110 not greater than 50% of the length to the second end 112. In some implementations, the inverted section 132 extends from the first end 110 at least 5% of the length to the second end 112. In some implementations, the inverted section 132 extends from the first end 110 between 10%-30% of the length to the second end 112. As can be seen in In some embodiments, at least some of the major pleats 124 at the first end 110 are inverted at section 135 ( In some embodiments, at least some of the minor pleats 126 at the first end 110 are inverted at section 137 ( In some embodiments, at least some of both the major pleats 124 and minor pleats 126 at the first end 110 are inverted at sections 135, 137, respectively, in an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat 104, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the first end 110 toward the second end 112. In some embodiments, all of the major pleats 124 and minor pleats 126 at the first end 110 are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat 104, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the first end 110 toward the second end 112. In some example embodiments, in general, the second end 112 does not include inverted sections 132, but will be the normal pleat folded direction. In other example embodiments (e.g., see As can be seen in Attention is again directed to The diagonal fold lines 148 form the inverted sections 135 for the major pleats 124. The diagonal fold lines 150 form the inverted sections 137 for the minor pleats 126. The media sheet 140 can be cellulose with or without fine fiber. Many variations can be used. Some analysis and initial tests were completed with pleating configurations as described herein with the inversion of a triangular section of the pleat nearest the outlet in a manner that increases the outlet size of the element, as illustrated in There can be significant pressure losses in a radial pleated element that are realized after the air has passed through the media. The pleat concentration in a radial pleated element decreases as a point travel. radially outward from the inner diameter to the outer diameter. Pleat Tip Inversion In an element cross-section that takes the form shown in The inverted pleat concepts described herein can mitigate the losses experienced at location five ( where P is the pressure loss, ρ is the density of the fluid, CLis a loss coefficient, and V is the local velocity. For a radially pleated element with a circular outlet, the velocity of the outlet is proportional to the area, or the diameter squared. This means that the contribution of this loss at location five is proportional to the fourth power of the element outlet diameter. By inverting the pleats at the outlet the end cap or sealing area is moved to the outer diameter of the element and the outlet diameter can now be increased to the outer diameter of the element without compromising or complicating the seal. Using the lumped parameter approach to calculate the contributions of the media pack to the overall pressure loss (location 2 in Pleat Concentration Leveling In a typical pleated, radial product the pleat concentration at the inner diameter is around 12 pleats per inch, where the outer diameter may have a pleat concentration of 7-8 pleats per inch. This represents a loss in potential media area for a given element size. One known way to increase media area is to put a combination of deep and shallow pleats into the same element, and fill more of the overall volume of the element with media (presumably increasing the life of the element). This results in higher pleat concentrations over a greater radial distance. A non-optimized example of this is shown in Even though the “4 Pleat Depths” example has nearly twice the media area of the “1 Pleat Depth” example, the flows associated with a six inch element could result in very high pressure drops with a one inch outlet. While a product with very deep pleats for a given diameter can utilize the pleat inversions, the pleat concentration implications with one pleat height may result in very low pleat concentrations at the outer diameter. Using pleat concentration leveling techniques as shown in Air Lab Testing A test matrix was constructed to compare: (i) the standard element construction (cylindrical, pleated element) with that of (ii) variable height pleat elements (e.g., “w pleats”); and (iii) the variable height pleats (“w pleats”) with inverted tips of The flow vs. pressure loss curves show that the variable height pleat elements with the 2.75″ piezometer are more restrictive than the other elements, yet the variable height pleats with inversions yield the lowest pressure loss, even though these two samples have the same media area. See The dust testing results shown in In a given application, the housing will also contribute to the initial restriction as well. For this reason, the terminal pressure drop due to the element is something closer to 17 in H2O for the comparison considered here. A tabular representation of this dust loading data and element characteristics is shown in Table 2. Some noteworthy characteristics are the space velocities for each of the elements and the specific dust loading calculations at the bottom of the table. The turned out area at the bottom of the inverted pleat elements was not counted as part of the diameter (though it is included in the element and pack volume calculations). The manner in which this was handled may be different for a given application Aside from the raw dust loading numbers, two other calculations were made to normalize the dust load to the space allotted. The first of which is the “Element Load (g/in3) @ 15″ H2O Rise” which is the grams of dust collected at 15 in H2O rise divided by the total volume of the element, including its interior volume that does not contain any media2. The basis for this was to look at how well the space inside the entire element volume was used as a dust collection medium, independent of the initial pressure drop. The other metric used was the “Pack Load (g/in3) @ 15″ H2O Rise”, which was intended to illustrate how well the volume of the media pack itself was loaded. The notion behind this is that this number would be highest when the ideal pleat concentration was achieved, and the dust loading was as even as possible. Based on some of these performance metrics, the convergence of the dust loading curves at the end of life between the variable height pleat and variable height pleat with inverted tips (element of In the arrangement of In some embodiments, at least some of both the major pleats 124 and minor pleats 126 at the second end 112 are inverted at sections 235, 237, respectively, in an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat 104, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the second end 112 toward the first end 110. In some embodiments, all of the major pleats 124 and minor pleats 126 at the second end 112 are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat 104, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the second end 112 toward the first end 110. In the embodiment depicted in The pleated media pack 102 is illustrated in The above represents example principles and embodiments. Many embodiments can be made applying these principles. A pleated media pack includes a section of media configured into a tube defining an interior volume and an open opening at one end. At least some of the pleats at both ends of the media pack are inverted. In some examples, the pleats include major pleats alternating with minor pleats. 1. A pleated media pack for use in a filter element; the media pack comprising:
(a) a section of filtration media folded into pleats; at least some of the pleats having a major pleat depth; (b) the section of filtration media being configured into a tube defining an interior volume, first and second opposite ends; and an opening at the first end; the opening having a diameter; wherein at least some of the pleats at the first end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the first end toward the second end; and
at least some of the pleats at the second end are inverted an opposite direction of the rest of the pleat, along at least a portion of the pleat length from the second end toward the first end. 2. The media pack of 3. The media pack of 4. The media pack of 5. The media pack of 6. The media pack of 7. The media pack of 8. The media pack of 9. The media pack of 10. The media pack of 11. The media pack of 12. The media pack of 13. The media pack of 14. A filter element according to (a) a first open end cap secured to the first end of the media pack; and (b) a second end cap secured to the second end of the media pack. 15. A filter element according to 16. A filter element according to TECHNICAL FIELD
BACKGROUND
SUMMARY
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Experimental
Executive Summary
Flow (scfm) 275 275 275 275 Media Face Vel (fpm) 7.9 10.4 9.2 9.2 Outer Diameter (in) 6.5 6.5 6 61 Inner Diameter (in) 4.25 4.25 3 3 Length (in) 13.5 10 10 10 Outlet Piezometer (in) 3.5 3.5 2.75 6 Number of Samples 3 2 3 3 1The inverted pleats add 1.75″ to the diameter of the element for the 1.5″ closest to the outlet. The potting operation used for the prototypes would allow this to be decreased to a 0.5″ addition to the diameter Air Lab test parameters and results Std. Product Variable (Cut to match heightPleat + Height of Variable Inversions Std. Product Others) heightPleat (FIGS. 1-13) Flow (scfm) 275 275 275 275 Pleat Depth (in) 1.13 1.13 1.5/0.38 1.5/0.38 ID Pleat Count 165 165 111 111 OD Pleat Count 165 165 222 222 Outer Diameter (in) 6.5 6.5 6 6 Inner Diameter (in) 4.25 4.25 3 3 Length (in) 13.5 10.3 10.3 10.3 Space Velocity (s−1) 17.7 23.2 27.2 26.8 Media Face Vel (fpm) 7.9 10.4 9.2 9.2 Media Area (in2) 5012 3824 4287 4287 Total Volume (in3) 448 342 291 295 Pack Volume (in3) 256 196 218 201 OD Pleat Conc. (in−1) 8.1 8.1 11.8 11.8 ID Pleat Cone (in−1) 12.4 12.4 11.8 11.8 Dust @ 17″ H2O (g) 880 516 625 648 Dust @ 15″ H2O Rise (g) 883 524 721 641 Dust Load per Media 0.18 0.14 0.17 0.15 Area @ 15″ H2O Rise (g/in2) Element Load (g/in3) @ 1.97 1.53 2.48 2.17 15″ H2O Rise Pack Load (g/in3) @ 15″ 3.44 2.68 3.30 3.19 H2O Rise 2For the inverted pleat elements, the volume of the inversions and the larger interior volume was included in this calculation 3Even though the media area is the same the pack volume is not, as the inverted sections of the pleats double back on themselves, effectively decreasing volume of the media pack.

















