VACCINE

01-02-1986 дата публикации
Номер:
AP0008600020D0
Автор:
Принадлежит:
Контакты:
Номер заявки: 8600020
Дата заявки: 07-02-1986

[1]

[2]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Malaria is a severe, widespread disease for which, despite years of extensive efforts, a vaccine has not been developed. See, for example, Science, Volume 226, page 679 (November 9, 1984). Experimentally, mammals, including man, have been protected against infection by the etiologic agent of malaria, Plasmodium, by vaccination with irradiated sporozoites. Clyde et al.,Am. J. Trop. Med.Hog., Volume 24, page 397 (1975) andRieckman et al., Bull, WHO, Volume 57 (Supp. 1), page 251 (1979). Yoshida et al., Science, Volume 207, page 71 (1980) report that such protection is at least partially mediated by antibody directed against a protein on the surface of the sporozoite, the circumsporozoite (CS) protein; monoclonal antibodies raised against CS proteins neutralize infectivity in vitro and protect animals in vivo. The CS protein appears to be highly evolutionarily conserved within species, but is quite varied across species.

[3]

Four species of Plasmodium are known to infect man. These are P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale and P.

[4]

malariae, the latter two occurring at much lower frequency. Other species of scientific interest are P.

[5]

berghei and P. knowlesi, the hosts of these species being, respectively, rodents and monkeys.

[6]

The CS protein of P. knowlesi comprises twelve tandem repeats of a twelve amino acid sequence. Zavala et al., J. Exp. Med., Volume 157, page 1947 (1983), report that the repeat unit is the major immunogen on the P.

[7]

knowlesi CS protein, based on experiments showing that monoclonal antibodies to the repeat unit blocked access of anti-sporozoite antisera to solubilized sporozoite protein. Gysin et al, J. Exp. Med., Volume 160, page 935 (lug84), reported that a synthetic 24 residue peptide representing tandem repeat units of the P. knowlesi CS protein neutralized infectivity of virulent sporozoites in monkeys.

[8]

Colman et al., WO 84-2922-A, published August 2, 1984, report cloning of a portion of the coding region for the P. knowlesi CS protein repeat unit and expression of beta-lactamase and beta-galactosidase fusions thereof inE. coli. Nussenzweig et al., U.S. 4,466,917, disclose a sporozoite protein referred to as the P44 protein and its cloning and expression in E. coli.

[9]

Enea et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 81, page 7520 (1984), report an analogous repeat unit structure within the CS protein of P. cynomologi.

[10]

Kemp et al., WO.84-02917-A, disclose cloning and expression of P. falciparum cDNA in E. coli.

[11]

Dame et al., Science, Volume 225, page 593 (1984), report cloning and expression of the CS protein ofP. falciparum in E. coli. The protein is described as comprising about 412 amino acids with an approximate molecular weight of 44,000. It comprises 41 tandem repeats of a tetrapeptide. Synthetic 7- 11- and 15residue peptides derived from the repeat region bound to monoclonal antibodies raised against the CS protein.

[12]

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION One aspect of the invention is an E. coli expression vector having a coding sequence for all or a portion of the repeat unit of the CS protein of Plasmodium falciparum.

[13]

In other aspects, the invention comprises E. coli transformed with the expression vector of the invention and a process for purifying a polypeptide having four or more tandem repeat units of the Plasmodium falciparum CS protein of the invention from a producing E, coli culture.

[14]

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURE Figure la is a partial restriction endonuclease cleavage map of a region of P. falciparum genomic DNA which carries the coding sequence for the CS protein.

[15]

Figure lb is a partial restriction endonuclease cleavage map of pASI.

[16]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The polypeptide of this invention comprises four or more tandem CS protein repeat units produced in E.

[17]

coli. It is not the CS protein, although it may comprise portions of the CS protein other than the repeat unit.

[18]

The P. falciparum repeat unit is a tetrapeptide having the following sequence: asparagine(asn)-alanine(ala)-asn-proline(pro)-.

[19]

Within the polypeptide of the invention,. variation of the tetrapeptide may be present, provided such does not significantly, adversely affect the reactivity of antibodies thereto with the P. falciparum CS protein. For example, as disclosed by Dame et al., Science, Volume 225, page 593 (1984), which is herein incorporated by reference as though fully set forth, of the 41 tetrapeptide repeats in the naturally occurring P. falciparum CS protein, 37 are asn-ala-asn-pro and 4 are asn-valine (vat aspartic acid(asp)-pro. Preferably, more than half of the tetrapeptide repeat units in the polypeptide of the invention are the so-called consensus sequence, asn-ala-asn-pro.

[20]

Preferably, the polypeptide of the invention comprises about 8 repeats, that is 32 amino acids, up to about 148 repeats. More preferably, the polypeptide comprises from about 16 to about 112 repeats.

[21]

The polypeptide of the invention can be a hybrid, that is, a fusion polypeptide, having non-CS protein repeat unit sequences. Such non-CS protein repeat sequence can serve as a carrier molecule to enhance immunogenicity or to facilitate cloning and expression in recombinant microorganisms. Alternatively, such additional sequence can carry one or more epitopes for other sporozoite immunogens, other Plasmodium immunogens and/or other non-Plasmodium immunogens. Specifically excluded from the invention is the CS protein which has been found not to be stabily expressed in practicable amounts in E. coli and not to be necessary for immunization against P. falciparum.

[22]

Specific embodiments of types of polypeptides of the invention exemplified herein are: Rtet32 polypeptides, which comprise at least 4 repeats with about 32 N-terminal amino acids from the tetracycline resistance (tetR) gene in pBR322 fused to theC-terminus of the repeats; Rtet86 polypeptides, which comprise at least 4 repeats with a tetR gene product fused to the C-terminus of the repeats; RNS1 polypeptides which comprise at least 4 repeats with the 227 amino acids of NS1 fused to theC-terminus of the repeats; NS1R polypeptides, which comprise at least 4 repeats with 81 N-terminal amino acids of NS1 fused to theN-terminus of the repeats; RG polypeptides which comprise at least 4 repeats followed by a -glycine residue at the C-terminus of the repeats;; - RtA polypeptides which comprise at least 4 repeats followed by -leucine-arginine residues at theC-terminus of the repeats; and RN polypeptides, which comprise at least 4 repeats followed by -asn-thr-val-ser-ser at the C-terminus of the repeats.

[23]

A genetic coding sequence for the CS protein repeat units can be obtained by known techniques. These include synthesis and, preferably, by obtainment from P.

[24]

falciparum by reverse transcription of messenger RNA as disclosed, for example, by Ellis et al., Nature, Volume 302, page 536 (1983), or by directly cloning the intact gene from P. falciparum genomic DNA as disclosed, for example, by Dame et al., cited previously. The Figure illustrates the CS protein coding region. P. falciparum, and sporozoites thereof, can be obtained from infected humans and mosquitoes.

[25]

Having cloned the coding sequence for all or part of the CS protein, a sub-fragment thereof coding for all or a portion of the repeat unit can be prepared by known techniques. Figure la shows selected available restriction sites within the CS protein gene. Preferred sites are the Xho II sites. Cutting with Xho TI releases a coding sequence for 16 repeats as follows: N-asp-pro[(asn-ala-asn-pro)l5(asn-val-asp-proul]nC.

[26]

where in n is one. Use of multiple tandem Xho II fragments in proper orientation results in longer repeats, that is, n is greater than one.

[27]

Techniques for synthesizing are well-known and can be accomplished using commercially available DNA synthesizers. A synthetic oligonucleotidet having codons for substantially the same amino acids and having the sameXho II ends or different cleavage sites at the ends, can be synthesized. Such synthetic oligonucleotides may vary from the natural 64 codons and may code for the same amino acids or for a polypeptide having a small number, preferably less than about 8, different amino acids, provided these do not significantly adversely affect the immunoprotectiveness of the polypeptide. An exemplary synthetic coding sequence codes entirely for the consensus sequence, (asn-ala-asn-pro-)n, wherein n is at least 4.

[28]

The coding sequence for the polypeptide can be inserted into any E. coli expression vector, many of which are known and available. The high level of expression of the polypeptides of the invention in E. coli is surprising in view of the unusual amino acid composition of the products - about 50% asparagine (asn), 25% alanine (ala) and 25% proline (pro). As described further below, it has been found that the coding sequence is expressed well using a regulatory element comprising the PL promoter of lambda and the clI ribosome binding site of lambda, as comprised by the plasmid pASl, described by Rosenberg et al., Meth. Enzytn., Volume 101, page 123 (1983) andShatzman et al., in Experimental Manipulation of GeneExpression, edit. by M.Inouye, Academic Press, New York, 1982. pASI carries the pBR322 origin of replication, an ampicillin resistance marker and a series of fragments from lambda, including PL, N antitermination function recognition sites (NutL and NutR), the rho-dependent transcription termination signal (tRI) and the cIT ribosome binding site, including the cII translation initiation site, the G residue of which is followed immediately by a Bam HI cleavage site. pASl can be derived from pKC30cII by deleting nucleotides between theBam HI site at the cII-pBR322 junction of pRC30cII and the cII ATG and religating the molecule to regenerate the Bam RI site immediately downstream of the ATG. pRC30cII is constructed by inserting a 1.3 kb Hae III fragment from lambda which carries the cII gene into the Hpa I site of pKC3O. See Shatzman et al., cited above, and Rosenberg et al., cited above. pKC30 is described by Shimitake et al.,Nature, Volume 292, page 128 (1981).It is a pBR322 derivative having a 2.4 kb Hind III-Bam HI fragment of lambda inserted between the Hind III and Bam HI sites in the tetR gene of pBR322. A construction similar to pASl is described by Courtney et al., Nature, Volume 313, page 149 (1985). pASi was deposited in the American TypeCulture Collection, Rockville, Maryland, under accession number ATCC in accordance with the terms of theBudapest Treaty. The coding sequence is operatively linked, that is, in correct orientation and in proper reading frame, to a regulatory element of an E. coli expression vector by standard techniques to construct an expression vector of the invention.

[29]

The polypeptide so expressed is isolated and purified from the producing culture by standard protein isolation techniques, many of which are well known in the art. An exemplary, useful purification scheme comprises 1) disruption of cells, 2) clarification of cellular debris, 3) separation of the polypeptides of the invention from other polypeptides present in the clarified cell extract and 4) final purification to remove residual contaminants including residual polypeptides, carbohydrates, nucleic acids and/or lipopolysaccharides.

[30]

The first step can be accomplished such as by addition of lysozyme or other lysing or permeabilizing agent or by mechanical or ultrasonic disruption. Prior to centrifugation or filtration to clarify the extract, a surfactant is added to keep the polypeptide of the invention in solution As one aspect of the present invention, it has been discovered that certain of the polypeptides of the invention can very efficiently be separated from other polypeptides by heating the clarified extract to about 8O0C following addition of a detergent to maintain solubility of the protein. Heating to 800C for at least about 4 minutes was discovered to cause nearly all bacterial polypeptides to precipitate without denaturing polypeptides comprised substantially of the repeats or of the repeats fused to other non-heat-denaturable sequences.The denatured bacterial polypeptides can be pelleted by centrifugation and removed. This procedure has been used to purify Rtet32, RG, RLA and Rtet86 polypeptides. In particular, this procedure was used to purify successfully R16tet32, R32tet32, R48tet32,R64tet32, R48G, R32LA and R16tet86, as described in the Examples, below, but heating of R16NS1 and R32NSl resulted in precipitation of these polypeptides.

[31]

The polypeptide of the invention can be further purified such as by addition of a selective precipitating agent, followed by a final chromatographic step such as ion exchange chromatography or reverse phase HPLC.

[32]

In the vaccine of the invention, an aqueous solution of the polypeptide of the invention, preferably buffered at physiological pH, can be used directly.

[33]

Alternatively, the polypeptide, with or without prior lyophilization, can be admixed or adsorbed with any of the various known adjuvants. Such adjuvants include, among others, aluminum hydroxide, muramyl dipeptide and saponins such as Quil A. As a further exemplary alternative, the polypeptide can be encapsulated within microparticles such as liposomes. In yet another exemplary alternative, the polypeptide can be conjugated to an immunostimulating macromolecule, such as killed Bordetella or a tetanus toxoid.

[34]

Vaccine preparation is generally described in NewTrends and Developments in Vaccines, edited by Voller et al., University Park Press, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A., 1978. Encapsulation within liposomes is described, for example, by Puller ton, U.S. Patent 4,235,877. Conjugation of proteins to macromolecules is disclosed, for example, by Likhite, U.S. Patent 4,372,945 and by Armor et al.,U.S. Patent 4,474,757. Use of Quil A is disclosed, for example, by Dalsgaard et al., Acta. Vet. Scand., Volume 18 page 349 (1977).

[35]

The amount of polypeptide present in each vaccine dose is selected as an amount which induces an immunoprotective response without significant, adverse side effects in typical vaccinees. Such amount will vary depending upon which specific polypeptide is employed and whether or not the vaccine is adjuvanted. Generally, it is expected that each dose will comprise 1 - 1000 ug of polypeptide, preferably 10 - 200 ug. An optimal amount for a particular vaccine can be ascertained by standard studies involving observation of antibody titres and other responses in subiects. Following an initial vaccination, subjects will preferably receive a boost in about 4 weeks, followed by repeated boosts every six months for as long as a risk of infection exists.

[36]

The following Examples are illustrative, and not limiting, of the invention. The CS protein coding sequence was supplied by James Weber, Walter Reed Rrmy Institute for Research, as a 2337 bp Eco RI fragment (see,Fig. la) of smPPl (Dame et al., cited above) in the Eco RI site of pUC8, a standard E. coli cloning vector (available, for example, from Bethesda ResearchLaboratories, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). The resulting pUC8 derivative is referred to as pUC8 clone 1.

[37]

EXAMPLESExample 1. CS Protein Derivative Purified pUC8 clone 1 plasmid DNA (40 ug) was digested with restriction endonucleases StuI and RsaI (100 units of each enzyme) in 400 ul of medium buffer (50 mM Tris, pH7.5, 50mM Nail, lmM dithiothreitol (DTT), r lOmM MgC12) for 1.5 hours at 370C. The resulting 1216 base pair fragment, encoding all but the first 18 amino acids of the CS protein was isolated by electrophoresis on a 5% polyacrylamide gel (PAGE). Expression vector pASl (10 ug) was digested with restriction endonuclease Bam HI (25 units) in 200 ul medium buffer for 1.5 hours at 370C.The cut plasmid was then treated with DNA polymerase large fragment (Klenow, 5 units; 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.5, 7mM high12, 60mM NaCl, 6mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 0.25mM of each of the four deoxynucleotide triphosphates; 25 C, 15 minutes) to end fill the Bam HI site. The CS gene fragment (1 ug) was then ligated into this vector (100ng) in 30 ul ligase buffer (50mM Tris, pH7.5, lmM DTT, lOmMMgC12, 100 uM rATP) with one unit of T4-DNA ligase for 16 hours at 40C.The ligation mixture was transformed into E. coli strain MM294C1+, and ampicillin resistant colonies were obtained, and screened for insertion of theCS gene fragment into the pASl. A plasmid with the correct construction (pCSP) was identified and was transformed into E. coli strain N5151 (cIts857) and tested for expression of the full length CS protein. (The 18 amino acid deletion at the amino terminus of the protein would correspond to a cleaved signal peptide of the authentic CS protein.) Cells were grown in Luria-BertaniBroth (LB) at 320C to an absorbance at 650nm (A650) of 0.6 and temperature induced at 420C for 2 hours to turn on transcription of the PL promoter of the expression plasmid and subsequent translation of the CS protein derivative.

[38]

Cells were sampled in 1 ml aliquots, pelleted, resuspended in lysis buffer (lOmM Tris-HCl, pH7.8, 25% (vol/vol) glycerol, 2% 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.1% bromophenyl blue) and incubated in a 1050C heating block for 5 minutes. Proteins were separated bySDS-PAGE (13% acrylamide, 30:0.8 acrylamide: bis-acrylamide ratio).Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose and the CS protein produced zn E. coll was detected by western blot analysis using a pool of five monoclonal antibodies reactive with the tetrapeptide repeat domain of the P. falciparum CS protein. (Dame et al., cited previously.)Example 2. R16tet86 Purified pUC8 clone 1 plasmid DNA (100 ug) was digested with restriction endonuclease Xho II (40 units) in 400 ul medium buffer at 370C for 16 hours. A 192 base pair fragment encoding 16 tetrapeptide repeats of the CS protein was then isolated by PAGE. Expression vector pAsi was cleaved with restriction endonuclease Bam HI as described in Example 1.The 192 base pair Xho II fragment (1 ug) was ligated into the Bam HI site of pASl (lOOng) as described in Example 1. The ligation mix was transformed into E. coli strain MM294CI+. A clone was identified which contained a single 192 base pair Xho II fragment in the correct orientation at the Bam HI site of pASl by polyacrylamie gel electrophoresis analysis of a BamHI-Hind II fragment of the plasmid, the Hind II site being downstream of the tetR gene and the Bam HI site being at the juncture of the cII ATG and the insert in correctly oriented plasmids. This plasmid pR16tet86 is illustrated as follows: pBR322 PL repeat tetR S pBR322 BH B B wherein BH represents a Bam HI site, B represents a Ban II site and S, a termination codon.The pRl6tet86 was used to transform E. coli strain N5151 (cIts857) and examined for production of the CS protein tetrapeptide repeat by western blot analysis. The protein so produced had the' Toll'ow'iKg sequence: N-met-asp-pro (asn-ala-asn-pr o) 15 (asn-val-asp-pr o) 1 T86-C wherein T86 was 86 amino acids derived from the tetracycline resistance gene present on pASl. TheN-terminal methionine (met) residue was also derived from the vector, more particularly, from the cII protein initiation codon.

[39]

Example 2A. R32tet86 and R48tet86 Purified pRl6tet86 plasmid DNA (10 ug) was digested with 25 units of Bam HI in 200 ul of medium buffer for 2 hours at 370C. One hundred ng of this DNA was then ligated with 1 ug of the 192 base pair Xho II fragment as described above. Plasmid expression vectors, pR32tet86 and pR48tet86, coding for the following polypeptides were prepared and expressed in E. coli.

[40]

N -me t - asp -pr o [ (as n- a la - asn -pr o ) 15(asn-val-asp-pro)ll.-T86-C wherein n is 2 (R32tet86) or n is 3 (R48tet86). pAS1 clones wherein n was 2 or 3 were selected from clones in which n was other than 2 or 3, respectively, as described above. All clones examined had the insert in the correct orientation. Both R32tet86 and R48tet86 were expressed at approximately the same levels as R16tet86, as estimated by immunoblotting.

[41]

Immunoblot analysis of several of the Rtet86 proteins revealed a heterogeneous set of products which could not be seen by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining. These proteins appeared to have accumulated to roughly half the amounts of the Rtet32 polypeptides, described below. It appeared that the sizes of the smallest degradation products were proportional to the number of tetrapeptide repeats in the clones. The instability of these proteins may be due to degradation of the heterologous COOH-terminal tail.

[42]

Example 3. R16tet32 Purified pR16tet86 DNA (10 ug) was cut with 25 units of restriction endonuclease Ban II in 200 ul of medium buffer for 2 hours at 370C. One hundred nanograms of the cut DNA was then ligated closed. This manipulation resulted in the deletion of a 14 base pair Ban II fragment and produced a termination codon just downstream of the remaining Ban II site. The resulting plasmid, pR16tet32, was used to express R16tet32 in E. coli 32 strain N5151 and R16tet32 was purified therefrom.

[43]

Thirty grams (wet weight) of E. coli containing R16tet32 were resuspended in 200 ml buffer A (50mM Tris HC1, pH 8.0, 2mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 5% (vol/vol) glycerol). Lysozyme was added to a final concentration of 0.2 mg/ml, and the mixture was incubated on ice for 30 minutes to lyse cells. The mixture was then treated in a Waring blender for 3 minutes at the high setting followed by sonication for one minute with a Branson 350 sonifier to shear bacterial DNA. Sodium deoxycholate was added to a final concentration of 0.18 (w/v), and this mixture was stirred for 30 minutes at 40C. The suspension was then centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 30 minutes to remove cell debris.The supernatant was collected in a flask, incubated in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes, and centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 30 minutes. It was found that nearly all E. coli proteins precipitated during the heat step and pelleted during the centrifugation, whereas, the R16tet32 protein was soluble and was contained in the supernatant. The supernatant was collected and ammonium sulfate was then slowly added to a final concentration of 20% of saturation. This resulted in selective precipitation of the Rl6tet32 protein which was then collected by centrifugation (12,000 x g for 30 minutes). At this point the R16tet32 protein was greater than about 95% pure with respect to other contaminating bacterial proteins.

[44]

- A final chromatographic step (e.g., ion exchange, reverse phase high performance liquid chromotography, phenyl sepharose chromatography, size separation, etc.) can then be performed to remove residual contamination by other materials such as proteins, carbohydrates, nucleic acids or lipopolysaccharides. R16tet32 was expressed and purified at levels approximately equal to 5% of totalE. coli protein, that is, about 30-60 mg/L, as shown byCoomasie Blue Staining.

[45]

R16tet32 has the following sequence: N-met-asp-pro[ (asn-ala-asn-pr o)15 (asn-val-asp-pro)ll nT32-C wherein n is one and T32 is 32 amino acids derived from the tetracycline resistance gene. More particularly, T32 has the following sequence: leuargarg-thr-his-arg-gly-arg-his-his-arg-arg-his-arg-cys -gly -cys-trp-arg-leu -tyr- arg-arg-h is-h is-arg -trp -g}y-arg-ser -gly-ser -C the remaining Ban II site being between residues 30 and 31.

[46]

Example 3A. R32tet32, R48 tet32 Substantially as described in Example 3, above,R32tet32 and R48tet32, (R16tet32 in which n is 2 and 3, respectively), were expressed in E. coli and isolated to the same level and degree of purity as R16tet32. The starting vectors were pR32tet86 and pR48tet86, respectively.

[47]

Example 3B. R64tet32, R80tet32 Purified pR48tet32 plasmid DNA (10 ug) was digested with 25 units of Bam HI in 200 ul of medium buffer for 2 hours at 370C. One hundred nanograms of thisDNA was then ligated with 1 ug of the 192 base pair Xho II fragment as described above. Plasmid expression vectors coding for the following polypeptides were prepared and expressed in E. coli.

[48]

N-met-asp-pro[ (asn-ala-asn-pro)15 (asn-val-asp-pro)l] 1]nT32C wherein n is 4 (R64tet32) or n is 5 (R80tet32). pASl clones wherein n was 4 or 5 were selected from clones in which n was other than 4 or 5, respectively, as described above. Both R64tet32 and R8btet32 expressed at approximately the same levels as R48tet32.R64te t32 was purified in substantially the same manner as R16tet32,R32tet32 and R48tet32, described above.

[49]

Example 3C. R96tet32 and R112tet32 Substantially as described in Example 3B, above, R96tet32 and R112tet32 (in which n is 6 and 7, respectively), were expressed in E. coli at approximately the same levels as R48tet32. The starting vector was pR80tet32.

[50]

Although some heterogeneity in purified Rtet32 polypeptides was observed by immunoblot analysis, the major reactive species correlated with the band seen by protein staining. The observed molecular weights bySDS-PAGE were approximately twice that expected, although the migration of each of the proteins was proportional to the number of tetrapeptide repeat units in each of the constructs. Amino acid composition determinations on several Rtet32 polypeptides were consistent with expected values.

[51]

Example 4. R16G pTerm was prepared by inserting a synthetic linker with the following sequence: 5'-GATCCCGGGTGACTGACTGA -3' 3'- GGCCCACTGACTGACTCTAG -5' into the Bam HI site of pASl. pASl (10 ug) was digested with 25 units of Bam HI. One hundred ng of the Bam PdI-cut pASl was ligated with 20 nanograms of the synthetic linker and plasmid pTerm was identified with one linker inserted into the Bam HI site of pASl. This vector retains the BamHI site and results in the insertion of TGA termination codons downstream of the ATG initiation codon of the cII protein in all three reading frames.

[52]

pRl6G was prepared by inserting the 192 base pairXho II fragment from pUC8 clone 1 into the Bam HI site of pTerm and a clone having a single Xho II insert in the proper orientation was selected substantially as described previously.

[53]

pR16G was cloned and expressed in E. coli strainN5151, substantially as described above.

[54]

R16G has the following sequence: N-met-asp-pro[(asn-ala-asn-pro) 15-(asn-val-asp-pro)13n-gly-C wherein n is one.

[55]

Since this protein does not contain any aromatic residues it cannot be visualized by Coomassie BrilliantBlue R-250 staining to quantitate expression levels. By immunoblot analysis with 5 monoclonal antibodies specific for the CS protein (Dame et al., cited previously), levels were estimated to be approximately 1% of total cell protein as compared to R16tet32, with which visualization by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining is possible.

[56]

Example 4A. R32G, R48G, R64G, RSOG and R112G R32G, R48G, R64G, R80G and R112G (R16G in which n is 2, 3, 4, 5 or 7, respectively) were expressed in E.

[57]

coli strain N5151 as described in Example 4, above. These polypeptides were expressed at about the same level asR16G. R48G was purified substantially as described inExample 3.

[58]

Example 5. R16LA and R32LA pTerm2 was prepared by inserting a synthetic linker with the following sequence: 5' -GATCCGCTGCGTT -3' 3'- GCGACGCAACTAG-5' into the Bam HI site of pASl, substantially as described in Example 4. pTerm2 retains the Bam HI site. The 192 base pair Xho TI fragment from pUC8 clone 1 was inserted as described above. pR1LA and pR32LA, clones having one or two Xho II inserts in the proper orientation, respectively, were selected substantially as described previously. R32LA was purified substantially as described in Example 3.

[59]

pR16LA and pR32LA were cloned and expressed in E.

[60]

coli strain N5151, substantially as described previously.

[61]

R16LA and R32LA have the following sequence: N-met-asp-pro[(asn-ala-asn-pro) 15 (asn-val-asp-pro)lln? leu-arg-C wherein n is 1 and 2, respectively. The C-terminal leucine and arginine derive from the synthetic linker in pTerm2. The R16LA was expressed as about 1% of total E.

[62]

coli protein, whereas, R32LA was expressed at approximately 5% of total cell protein.

[63]

Example 6. R16NS1 pASldeltaEH was prepared by deleting a non-essential Eco RI - Hind III region of pBR322 origin from pASl. Ten micrograms of pASl was cut with Eco RI andHind III (20 units each) in 200 ul of medium buffer, treated with DNA polymerase (Klenow), ligated closed, and transformed into E. coli, substantially as described above. A clone with the 29 base pair Eco RI - Hind III fragment deleted was identified. A 1236 base pair Bam HI fragment of pAPR801 (Young et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

[64]

U.S.A., Volume 80, page 6105 (1983)), containing the influenza virus (A/PR/8/34) NS1 coding region within 861 base pairs of viral origin and 375 base pairs of pBR322 origin, was inserted into the Bam H1 site of pASldeltaEH.

[65]

The resulting plasmid, pASldeltaEH/80l, expresses authentic NS1 (230 amino acids). This plasmid retains theBam El site between the cIT translation start site and the NS1 coding sequence.

[66]

pASldeltaEH/801 (10 ug) was cut with Eco RI (20 units) and Sal I (20 units) in 200 ul of high buffer (50mM Tris-HCl, pH7.5, lmM DTT, lOmM MgC12, l00mM Nail) for 2 hours at 37 C, treated with DNA polymerase large fragment (Klenow), and ligated closed, substantially as described above. A clone having the 650 base pair Eco RI-Sal I region deleted was isolated. This plasmid, pNSldeltaES, expresses authentic NSl.

[67]

pR16NSl was prepared by inserting a 192 base pair, Xho II fragment from pUC8 clone 1 into the Bam HI site in pNSldeltaES and clones having a single Xho II insert in proper orientation were selected substantially as described previously.

[68]

pR16NSl was cloned and expressed in E. coli, andR16NS1 was purified, substantially as described above, omitting the boiling step.

[69]

R16NS1 has the following sequence: N-met-asp-prot (as n -ala -as n -pr o) 15 (asn-val-asp-pr o)ll n N227 where n is one and N227 is 227 amino acids of NS1 origin.

[70]

Rl6NSl in the R16NS1 preparation was estimated to comprise greater than 80% of protein, without the boil or ion exchange step. R16NS1- represented an especially surprising high proportion, approximately 25%, of total cellular protein.

[71]

Example 6A. R32NS1, R48NS1 and R64NS1 R32NSl (R16NS1 in which n is 2) was expressed in and purified from E. coli, substantially as described inExample 3, above, omitting the boiling step. R32NS1 was expressed at about the same level as R16NS1 and purified to about the same degree.

[72]

R48NS1 (R16NS1 in which n is 3) and R64NS1 (R16NS1 in which n is 4) were expressed in E. coli substantially as described above. R48NS1 and R64NS1 expressed at about 10% and 5% of total E. coli protein, respectively.

[73]

Example 7. NS1R48 pR48tet86 was cleaved with Bam HI and end-filled with DNA polymerase (Klenow) substantially as described above. The plasmid was then cleaved with Ban II as described above, to release a 672 base pair fragment carrying 3 Xho II fragments and 96 base pairs from the tetraycline resistance gene.

[74]

Ten micrograms of pASldeltaEH/801 was cut withNco I (20 units) in 200 ul of high buffer for 2 hours at 37 C, and end-filled with DNA polymerase large fragment (Klenow) substantially as described above. The Nco I site is in the codon for residue 81 in NSl. The plasmid was then cut with Ban II, as described above to delete the remaining NS1 codons and a portion of the tetracycline resistance gene, to produce pASldeltaEH/801-l.

[75]

The 672 base pair, Bam HI (end-filled) -Ban IT fragment was inserted into pASldeltaEH/801-l to prepare pNSlR48. This plasmid was expressed in E. coli, substantially as described above. NS1R48 has the following sequence: N-81N-asp-pro[(asn-ala-asn-pro)l5(asn-val-asp-proljn T32-C wherein 81N is 81 N-terminal amino acids of NS1, n is 3 and T32 is as described above. NS1R48 was expressed as about 5% of total cellular protein.

[76]

Example 8. R32N Ten micrograms of pR32NSl was cut with Hind III (25 units) in 200 ul af medium buffer for 2 hours at 37 C, and end-filled with DNA polymerase substantially as described above, to produce pR32NSl-1. The Hind IIf site is in the codon for residue 5 in the NS1 coding region.

[77]

pR32NSl-l(100ng) was then ligated closed substantially as described above. The resulting plasmid, pR32N, now contained a TAA termination codon after the fifth codon in the NSl coding sequence. pR32N was used to express R32N in E. coli substantially as described previously.

[78]

R32N has the following sequence: N-met-asp-pro[(asn-ala-asn-pro) 15-(asn-val-asp-pro) 1] n -N5-C wherein n is 2 and N5 is 5 amino acids derived from the NS1 gene. More particularly, N5 has the following sequence: -asn-thr-val-ser-ser-C.

[79]

R32N was expressed as about 5% of total E. coli protein.

[80]

Example 9. Antibody Response - ELISA Recombinant proteins R16tet32, R32tet32 andR48tet32 were purified substantially as described above, dialyzed against .01 M phosphate buffered saline, pB 7.0 (PBS), aliquoted, and stored at -800C. Constructs were mixed with either PBS, aluminum hydroxide (alum) orComplete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA) to yield a 0.5 ml dose containing 50 ug protein. CFA (GIBCO, Grand Island, NewYork) plus antigen in PBS were emulsified in a 1:1 ratio by agitation for 30 minutes on a mechanical vortexer.

[81]

Alum was prepared from aluminum hydroxide gel, USP, diluted in PBS. Antigen was absorbed to alum at 40C for 12 hours on a rotary mixer. The suspension was allowed to settle for an additional 12 hours and sufficient supernatant was discarded to yield 0.80 mg Al and 50 ug recombinant protein per dose. Six to eight week old C5781/6 mice were immunized with a total of 50 ug of protein subcutaneously and intraperitoneally (5 animals per group). Animals were boosted 4 weeks after the primary immunizaton following the same protocol as for the first injections, except that the group which had received the immunogens in CFA were boosted with proteins emulsified in Incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA).One week later, whole blood obtained by tail bleeding was pooled, clotted overnight at 40C, and centrifuged to separate the serum. These sera were stored at -800C until needed.

[82]

An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to test all sera for their ability to react with a 16 amino acid synthetic peptide consisting of four repeats of the P. falciparum CS protein (asn-ala-asn-pro)4 Dame et al. (Science, Volume 225, page 593 (1984). Synthetic peptide antigen was coupled to bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used to coat the wells of microtiter plates. Fifty ul (0.1 ug) of the screening antigen diluted with 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4, (PBS), were pipetted into wells of polystyrenq microtitration plates (Immunlon 2 Dynatech Laboratories, Alexandria, VA) and held overnight at room temperature (about 220C) (RT).Well contents were then aspirated, filled with blocking buffer (BBr 1.08 BSA, 0.5% casein, 0.005% thimersol and 0.0005% phenol red in PBS) and held for 1 hour at RT. Mouse sera were diluted serially in BB and 50 ul was added to each well. After a 2 hour incubation at RT, wells were aspirated, washed three times with PBS-0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-TW20) and 50 ul of horseradish peroxidase conjugated to goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (Bio-Rad Laboratories,Richmond, CA) diluted 1/500 with 10% heat inactivated human serum in PBS was added to each well.After 1 hour, well contents were aspirated, washed three times withPBS-TW20 and 150. ul of. substrate (1 mg 2,2'-azino-di (3-ethyl-benzthiazoline sulfonic acid-6) per ml of 0.1 M citrate-phosphate buffer, pE 4.0, with 0.005% hydrogen peroxide added immediately before use) was then added to each well. Absorbance at 414 nm was determined 1 hour later with a ELISA plate reader (Titertek Multiskan, Flow laboratories, Zinc., McLean, VA). The R16tet32,R32tet32 and R48tet32 constructs all resulted in the production of antibody which reacted in theELISA.R16tet32, when administered alone, was poorly immunogenic when compared to R32tet32 and R48tet32.

[83]

Both alum and CFA enhanced immunogenicity of all three proteins and antibody was detected at titers out to 102,000 in at least one regimen.

[84]

Example 10. Antibody Response - IFA The antisera from Example 9 were shown to react strongly with authentic P. falciparum CS protein which tested in an indirect immunofluorescent antibody assay (IFA). Reactivity against P. knowlesi, P. cynomologi, P.

[85]

viva, and P. gallinaceum was not detected. A slight reactivity of the antisera to R32tet32 was seen with P.

[86]

berghei. This observation is consistent with previous data by Hockmeyer et al., in Proc. 3d Int'l. Symp.

[87]

Immunobiol. Proteins Peptides, ed. by Atassi, M.Z., PlenumNew York (in press) showing that some Mabs to P.

[88]

falciparum react with P. berghei sporozoites by IFA.

[89]

Sporozoites were dissected from the salivary glands of infected mosquitoes substantially as described by Bosworth, J. parasitol., Volume 61, page 769 (1975), diluted in saline or Medium 199 (GTBCO)containing 0.5% BSA, counted using a haemacytometer and diluted to 2,000-5,000 sporozoites per 10 ul. Ten ul aliquots were spread onto each well of multi-well printed IFA slides, air dried at room temperature and stored at -800C.

[90]

IFA's were initiated by spreading 20 ul volumes.

[91]

of serum, diluted 1/100 with BE, onto the well of an IFA slide containing dried sporozoites. After a 20 minute incubation in a moist chamber at RT, the serum solutions were aspirated and the spots were washed with 2 drops ofPBS. Twenty ul aliquots of goat anti-mouse antibody conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (Kirkegard andPerry, Gaithersburg, MD) diluted 1:40 with BE were then added to each spot. After a second 20 minute incubation at RT the spots were again washed with 2 drops of PBS, mounted in glycerol and examined under UV light at 500X magnification for fluorescence.

[92]

Example 11. CSP Reaction Sera from mice immunized with R16tet32, R32tet32 and R48tet32 produced strong CSP positive reactions (Table 1). When administered without adjuvant, only R16tet3z failed to produce antibody which gave positive CSP reactions, whereas, when given with CFA or alum, all three constructs induced antibodies, which produced strong CSP reactions.

[93]

Table 1. CSP Reactivity of Antisera to R16tet32, R32tet32, and R48tet32 AntiseraADJUVANT R16tet32 R32tet32 R48tet32NONE 0/25(-) 17/25(2+) 21/25(4+)CFA 23/25(4+) 21/25(4+) 21/25(4+)ALUM 25/25(4+) 25/25/(4+) 16/27(2+-4+) CSP reactions were performed essentially as described by Vanderberg et al. Mil. Med. Volume 134 (Supp.

[94]

1), page 1183 (1969). Five microliters containing 500-1,000 P. falciparum mosquito salivary gland sporozoites resuspended in Medium 199 were mixed with 5 ul of serum on a microscope slide, sealed under a cover slip rimmed with petroleum jelly and incubated at 370C. for 1 hour. Reactions were evaluated by phase contrast microscopy at 400X magnification. Twenty-five random sporozoites were examined for each serum sample and the number of CSP positive organisms are indicated. The degree of CSP reactivity as described by Vanderberg et al., cited'above, is shown in parentheses. A (-) indicates no CSP reactivity detectable; (2+) indicates appearance of a granular precipitate on the surface of the sporozoites; (4+) indicates appearance of a long, thread-like filament at one end of the sporozoites.

[95]

Normal mouse serum, and serum from mice immunized with CFA alone, produced no detectable CSP reactivity in parrallel assays.

[96]

Example 12. Hepatocyte Blocking The sera from Example 9, above, were examined in an in vitro inhibition of invasion assay (Table 2). These data show that the R32tet32 and R48tet32 prpteins induce antibodies with strong blocking activity even in the absence of adjuvant. R16tet32 was less efficient in eliciting strong blocking antibodies except when administered adsorbed to alum. This finding is consistent with the poor CSP reactivity and low ELISA titers observed with the antisera raised to the R16tet32 protein.

[97]

Table 2. Inhibition of P. falciparum Sporozoite Invasion HepG2 - A16 Hepatoma cells in vitro.

[98]

AntiseraADJUVANT R16 R32 R48NONE 46 95 92CFA 76 92 94ALUM 100 100 96 Inhibition of sporozoite invasion of cultured cells was performed substantially as previously described by Hollingdale et al. J. Immunol. Volume 32, page 909 (1984). The sera obtained from mice immunized with theR16tet32, R32tet32 and R48tet32 constructs were tested for their ability to inhibit invasion of cultured cells by P. falciparum sporozoites. The sera were diluted in culture medium and added to HepG2-A16 cell cultures to yield a final dilution of 1:20 (V/V). Cultures then received 12,000 to 40,000 mosquito salivary gland P.

[99]

falciparum sporozoites and were incubated at 370C in 5% CO2 atmosphere for 3 hours, rinsed wtih Dulbecco 's phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed in methanol, and rinsed 2 times with PBS.

[100]

Sporozoites that had entered cells were visualized by an immunoperoxidase antibody assay (IPA) (Hollingdale et al., cited above). The IPA was carried out by first treating the fixed cultures with a Mab toP. falciparum (2Fl.l, See, Dame et al., cited above) followed by incubation with rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin conjugated with horseraddish peroxidase and staining with 3,3-diaminobenzidine. The number of sporozoites that invaded cultured cells was determined by counting the intracellular parasites present in the entire preparation on a leitz microscope at 250X with a dark blue filter. Experiments were carried out either in duplicate or triplicate and each cell culture within an experiment received an equal number of sporozoites.Inhibition was the percentage reduction of sporozoite invasion by anti-construct immune sera compared to normal mouse serum controls where CS reactive Mab 2Fl.l gave 100% inhibition of sporozoite invasion at dilutions of 1/20.

[101]

Recombinant proteins RLA, R16NS1 and R32NS1, prepared substantially as described above, were similarly tested by the ELISA and IFA assays and were shown similarly to induce antibody which reacted with the 16 residue synthetic peptide and to give positive CSP reactions. R32tet32 and R32LA are preferred, because of their relative homogeneity, expression levels, and ease of preparation.

[102]

Of primary interest in any synthetically produced vaccine, is whether antibody produced against the synthetic immunogen will recognize the authentic molecule and whether the antibody will possess the necessary biological properties to confer protection. The Examples showing both an immunofluorescence assay and the CSP reaction demonstrate that antibody produced against the E.

[103]

coli constructs reacts with the surface of the sporozoite and thus recognizes authentic CS protein. The presence ofCSP antibody has been shown in animals and man to be an important correlate of protective immunity. The fact that anti-construct antibodies inhibit sporozoite invasion of human hepatoma cells in vitro is significant. Hollingdale et al., cited above, showed that both Mabs against P.

[104]

falciparum and P. vivax as well as polyclonal serum from humans immune to these malaria species blocked sporozoite invasion. Blocking of sporozoite invasion in vitro is thus considered to be an assay for protective antibody.

[105]

Thus, the data collectively demonstrates that the vaccine of the invasion can be used to protect humans from infection by P. falciparum sporozoites.

[106]

The immune response to these recombinant proteins as assessed by ELISA titer, surface reactivity (as shown by IFA and CSP) and blocking of sporozoite invasion is enhanced by use of either Complete Freunds Adjuvant orAlum. Complete Freunds Adjuvant can not be used in humans since it causes fever, produces granulomas and results in tuberculin hypersensitivity. Alum is currently used as an adjuvant in established vaccines such as diptheria and tetanus toxoid as well as one of the newest vaccines,Heptitis B. It has proven efficacy and a long history of safe use in man.

[107]

Example 13. Vaccine Preparation An illustrative vaccine is prepared as follows.

[108]

To a buffered, aqueous solution of 3% aluminum hydroxide (10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, pH 6.8; sterilized by filtration), the polypeptide of the invention in similar buffer is added with stirring to a final concentration of 100 ug/ml of polypeptide and 1.0 mg/ml of 1 w aluminum (Al ). The pH is maintained at 6.6. The mixture is left overnight at about OOC. Thimersol is added to a final concentration of 0.005%. The pH is checked and adjusted, if necessary, to 6.8.

[109]

While the above fully describes the invention and all preferred embodiments thereof, it is to be appreciated that the invention is not limited to the embodiments particularly described but rather includes all modifications thereof coming within the scope of the following claims.

[110]

CLAIMS for the Contracting States BE - CH - DE - FR - GB - IT - LI - LU - NL - SE 1. An E. coli expression vector having a coding sequence for all or a portion of the repeat unit of the CS protein of Plasmodium falciparum operatively linked to a regulatory element.

[111]

2. The vector of claim 1 which comprises the XhoII - Xho II region of the CS protein coding sequence or tandem repeats thereof.

[112]

3. The vector of claim 1 in which the coding sequence codes for at least 4 tandem repeats.

[113]

4. The vector of claim 3 in which the coding sequence codes for about 16 to 148 repeat units.

[114]

5. The vector of claim 4 in which the coding sequence codes for a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of Rtet32 polypeptides, Rtet86 polypeptides, RNSl polypeptides, NS1R polypeptides, RG polypeptides, RLA polypeptides, and RN polypeptides.

[115]

6. The vector of claim 4 in which the coding sequence codes for a polypeptide selected from R16tet86 R32G R32tet86 R48G R48 tet 86 R64G R16 tet32 R8OG R32tet R112G R48tet R16LA R64 tet32 R32LA R80tet32 R16NS1 R96tet R32NS1 R112 tet32 R48NS1 R16G R64NS1 NS1R48 R32N.

[116]

7. The vector of claim 4 in which the polypeptide is R32tet32 or R32LA.

[117]

8. The vector of claim 1 in which the regulatory element comprises the PL promoter and the cII ribosome binding site including the cII translation initiation site.

[118]

9. The vector of claim 8 having the pASl regulatory elements..

[119]

10. An E. coli transformed with the vector of claim 1.

[120]

11. An E. coli transformed with the vector of claim 2.

[121]

12. An 33. coli transformed with the vector of claim 3.

[122]

13. An E. coli transformed with the vector of claim 4.

[123]

14. An E. coli transformed with the vector of claim 5.

[124]

15. An E. coli transformed with the vector of claim 6.

[125]

16. An E. coli transformed with the vector of claim 7.

[126]

17. An E. coli transformed with the vector of claim 8.

[127]

18. An E. coli transformed with the vector of claim 9.

[128]

19. A method of purifying a polypeptide having four or more tandem repeat units of the Plasmodium falciparum CS protein from a clarified cell extract of producing E. coli which comprises addition of a detergent to the cell extract followed by heating ef the extract to precipitate bacterial proteins and then further purifying the polypeptide from the supernatant.

[129]

20. A method of producing a polypeptide having for or more tandem repeat units of the Plasmodium falciparum CS protein comprising culturing the E. coli of claim 10 such that the polypeptide is produced and purifying the polypeptide therefrom.



[130]

A vaccine for protecting mammals against malaria is prepared by a process comprising inserting a coding sequence for all or a portion of the repeat unit of the CS protein of Plasmodium falciparum into an E. coli expression vector such that the coding sequence is operatively linked to a regulatory element, culturing the transformed E. coli such that the polypeptide is produced and purifying the polypeptide therefrom.



CLAIMS for the Contracting State AT

1. A process for preparing a polypeptide which can be used in a vaccine to protect humans against infection by Plasmodium falciparum comprising inserting a coding sequence for all or a portion of the repeat unit of the CS protein of Plasmodium falciparum into anE. coli expression vector such that the coding sequence is operatively linked to a regulatory element, culturing the transformed E. coli such that the polypeptide is produced and purifying the polypeptide therefrom.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the coding sequence for the repeat unit or for the portion of the repeat unit is the XhoII-XhoII region of the CS protein coding sequence or tandem repeats thereof.

3. The process of claim 1 which comprises inserting a coding sequence for at least 4 tandem repeat units into the expression vector.

4. The process of claim 3 which comprises inserting a coding sequence for 16 to 48 tandem repeat units.

5. The process of claim 4 in which the coding sequence codes for a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of Rtet32 polypeptides1 Rtet86 polypeptides, RNS1 polypeptides, NS1R polypeptides. RG polypeptides, RLA polypeptides, and RN polypeptides.

6. The process of claim 4 in which the coding sequence codes for a polypeptide selected from R16tet86 R32G R32tet86 R48G R48tet86 R64G R16tet32 R80G R32tet32 R112G R48tet32 R16LA R64tet32 R32LA R80tet32 R16NNS1 R96tet32 R32NS1 R112tet32 R48NS1 R16G R64NS1 7. The process of claim 4 in which the polypeptide is R32tet32 or R32LA.

8. The process of claim 1 in which the regulatory element comprises the PL promoter and the cII ribosome binding site including the cII translation initiation site.

9. The process of claim 8 in which the regulatory element is the regulatory element of pAS-l.

10. The process of claim 1 in which the polypeptide is purified by adding a detergent to a cell extract of the E. coli transformants, heating the extract to precipitate bacterial proteins and then further purifying the polypeptide from the supernatant by standard protein purification techniques.