BIOLOGICAL INOCULANT HAVING ENHANCED FERTILIZING AND FUNGICIDAL ACTIVITY
The present invention generally relates to the field of agricultural technology for enhancing the performance of industrial crops. In particular, the invention refers to a biological inoculant having both fertilizing and fungicidal activity, which enhances crop plants' growth and yield. More particularly, the present invention relates to a bio-inoculant having the said combined effects, comprising All over the world millions of hectares are sown every year for soybean. The different sown areas span diverse environments, where plants may be exposed to several phytopathogens affecting the crop yield. Normally, crops are exposed to a great number of diseases having a strong impact on the harvest yield. The way for addressing these issues currently relies on the use of chemical pesticides. However, these decrease the quality of the environment and compromise the farmer's health. In addition to the significant direct effects of agrochemicals on the environment, their disproportionate use is another relevant aspect to be taken into account, especially considering that it promotes the developing of resistance in the targeted organisms. The consequence of this effect has a major impact since aggressive agents must progressively be used on the pathogenic microorganisms, which in turn results in an increasing aggressiveness on the environment and the farmer. Therefore, the development of new strategies for controlling phytopathogens that can guarantee crop health is of global interest, especially without compromising the ecological integrity of the environment while reducing their impact on human health. Currently, national and international sectors of agribusiness have placed a considerable interest on the development of pest control products of biological origin for addressing plant diseases. Soybean is one of the most economically important crops in countries with a high developed agricultural industry. During the 2016 period, in Argentina for instance, more than 21 million hectares were sown, implying a huge market demand for the use of phytopathological control agents. Therefore, the development of a new generation of inoculants for addressing this pest issue has a great demand potential in agribusiness. As such, The use of The effectiveness of However, it is also a concern that biological agents for controlling pests produce broad-spectrum antimicrobial compounds that would inhibit the normal development of bacteria that are beneficial to the soil quality, including Peptaibols, polyketides, pyrones, terpenes and diketopiperazine-like compounds are the main antimicrobial compounds produced by In addition, light, high temperatures and humidity affect conidia viability. Currently available bio-fungicidal agents are formulated based on conidial suspensions which display a limited viability of the final pest-controlling product, due to degradation of conidia, which turns the fungal agent ineffective. Particularly, the formulation of the biological inoculant of the invention allowed an amount of 109conidia per milliliter, and its pest control efficiency was verified in serial dilutions of up to 106conidia/ml. Said concentrations provide an advantage over biological agents known to date and also allow for a broader viability window in the formulations. Nonetheless, although it is not possible to foresee the impact of previously mentioned antimicrobial secreted compounds, the present inventors have found an adequate and effective combination of biological agents, providing enhanced pest control activity and at the same time promoting plant growth. To the inventors' knowledge, no combination of beneficial bacteria and biological antifungal agents has been considered to date that successfully applies to crop fields. In particular, there are no biological inoculants available that provide both fertilization and antifungal activities, useful for agricultural crops of economic interest. Due to the inventors' strategy for isolation, culture and selection, the present invention allowed the generation of a highly efficient bio-controller reaching a high standard for simultaneous control of five of the most aggressive plant pathogens for soybean. This is consistent with the low dose required to achieve the expected results in field trials (1 ml/Kg seed) at a concentration of 106spores/ml. The results reached by the present invention exceeds those obtained by Zafari et al. (Zafari et al. 2011. Therefore, the present invention acknowledges the current need for a biofungicide developed for extensive farming and effective crop biofertilization, which also protects agricultural crops of interest against fungal infection, and at the same time allows for a cost-effective, safe and easy-to-use formulation having a high commercial durability and longer viability. The present invention describes a biological inoculant for controlling phytopathogens, which contributes in fighting the main plant pests having great impact on agricultural crops, more preferably soybean, and also in reducing the use of chemical pesticides. Accordingly, the first object of the present invention is a biological inoculant comprising: a) In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the biological inoculant comprises a) In a more preferred embodiment of the invention, the Consequently, the present invention discloses a The bio-inoculant of the present invention exerts a combined action of biofertilization and biological control. This mixed bio-inoculant formulation comprises According to an embodiment of the biological inoculant of the invention, It is also another object of the invention to provide a use of the claimed biological inoculant for protecting agricultural crop plants against the infection by phytopathogenic fungi. Preferably, the crop plants are selected from soybean, wheat, maize, sunflower, cotton, sorghum, alfalfa, flax, canola, chickpea, rice, potato, onion, yerba mate ( In a more preferred embodiment, the phytopathogenic fungi may be selected, without limitation, from the group consisting of The present invention also provides a method for protecting agricultural crop plants against the infection by phytopathogenic fungi, said method comprising applying the biological inoculant to the seeds of agricultural crop plants before cultivation. Preferably, in the method for protecting agricultural crop plants against the infection by phytopathogenic fungi, the crop plants are selected from soybean, wheat, maize, sunflower, cotton, sorghum, alfalfa, flax, canola, chickpea, rice, potato, onion, yerba mate ( In a preferred embodiment of the method for protecting agricultural crop plants against the infection by phytopathogenic fungi, the phytopathogenic fungi may be selected, without limitation, from the group consisting of The following figures form part of the present specification and are included to further illustrate certain aspects of the present invention, without limiting the scope thereof. The present application discloses a biological inoculant having both fertilizing and fungicidal activity. More particularly, said bio-inoculant has the abovementioned combined effects, and consists of a fertilizer and a pesticide, both of biological origin. More specifically, the bio-inoculant of the present invention comprises As discussed above herein, the present inventors sought for a biological control agent for protecting agricultural crop plants against the infection by phytopathogenic fungi, including those responsible for the most renowned diseases in many agricultural crops of relevance, such as crops selected from soybean, wheat, maize, sunflower, cotton, sorghum, alfalfa, flax, canola, chickpea, rice, potato, onion, yerba mate ( In particular, protection is exerted against infection by pathogens from the genera The present inventors carried out extensive research and were able to generate numerous In order to determine the genus and species of the selected Observation of the isolates allowed the identification of aerial mycelia in them; also, green ellipsoidal conidia were produced from effused and branched conidiophores, with regularly paired phialides. Based on the experimental assays carried out by the inventors on three selected isolates, it was shown that these According to the invention, the bio-inoculant comprises Particularly, the formulation of the biological inoculant of the invention allowed an amount of 109conidia per milliliter, and its pest control efficiency was verified in serial dilutions of up to 106conidia/ml. Said concentrations provide an advantage over biological agents known to date and also allow for a broader viability window in the formulations. Also, the present invention relates to a use of the claimed biological inoculant for protecting agricultural crop plants against the infection by phytopathogenic fungi, as well as to a method for the biological control of phytopathogenic fungi in agricultural crop plants, comprising the application of an inoculant according to the invention to the seeds of the crop of interest. Below, experimental assays are described for better understanding how to take into practice the present invention. The invention will now be further described based on the following examples. It is to be understood that these examples are intended for illustrative purposes only, and by no means should be construed to be limiting the scope of the invention, which is only defined by the appended claims. As described herein before, a total of 60 In order to determine the antagonistic activity of the soil isolates, confrontation assays were performed with a series of phytopathogenic fungi, including those responsible for the most renowned diseases in plant crops: These genera of fungal pathogens affect many agronomically relevant crops, such as soybean, wheat, maize, sunflower, cotton, sorghum, alfalfa, flax, canola, chickpea, rice, potato, onion, yerba mate ( During several growth rounds in the presence of the above mentioned fungal pathogens, 60 Micro- and macroscopic characterization of said three isolated The distinctive green coloration of the Confrontation assays were carried out using Trch3 culture and exposing the strain to five agriculturally relevant pathogens. It was concluded that these three strains had a high efficiency for the biological control of soybean diseases derived from phytopathogenic fungi infection. The effects of the three isolated Later assays demonstrated that the selected three In the same assays, a significant increase in seedling vigor and development was also detected, suggesting that strains additionally have beneficial effects on the growth rate of inoculated plants (estimated based on the development of the second plant trifoliate leaf) as shown in Crops were established and grown in order to evaluate the growth capacity of both microorganisms: Soybean plant nodulation capacity was also evaluated in the presence of Treatments were applied in first quality soybean. The experiment was implemented in the city of Pergamino, located to the north of the Buenos Aires province (33°57′51.87″S 60°34′36.89″W), on a Pergamino Series soil, typical Argiudol, mixed family, franca soil texture, thermal, Class 1-2, IP=85. The sowing was carried out with soybean variety DM 4615 STS, in rows spaced at 0.40 m. The experimental site registers a continuous agricultural rotation with several soybean crops in sequence. The ancestor was soybean. The base fertilization was carried out by applying 100 kg ha−1of a composition mixture (7-17-0 S5). Plots were kept completely free of weeds and pests. The test was designed as follows: totally random blocks with four repeats and five treatments. The different treatments are detailed in Table 2, below. For this assay, number of nodules per plant, nodule size, localization and functionality were determined. According to the results obtained for this field test, plants treated with the Regarding the physiological changes, plants treated with Also, the effect of In this field test, the experiment was directed to the evaluation of the impact of different seed biological treatments over soybean crop productivity. The test was designed as totally random blocks with four repeats and six treatments (T1 control and T2-T6 biological and chemical treatments). The different evaluated strategies are detailed in Table 4 below. All samples were firstly treated with 3 ml/kg of The experiment was carried out at an agricultural experimental station in the city of Pergamino, located to the north of the Buenos Aires province (33°57′51.87″S 60°34′36.89″W), on a Pergamino Series soil, typical Argiudol, mixed family, franca soil texture, thermal, Class 1-2, IP=85. The sowing was carried out with soybean variety N4619 RG STS Ipro, in rows spaced at 0.40 m. The experimental site registers a continuous agricultural rotation with a high intensification level and crop rotation. Insecticides and fungicides were applied during the treatment cycle for preventing attack by bollworm moth and chinch bug as well as other plant diseases. Plots were kept completely free of weeds and pests. A base fertilization was carried out by applying 80 kg ha−1of a composition mixture (10-40-0-S9). Seeds in all the different treatment lots were inoculated with Plants emerged 15 days after sowing were recounted. NDVI was determined on growing stage R4 by means of Green seeker sensor and radiation interception. Also, nitrogen content was estimated by measuring chlorophyll with a Minolta Spad 502, and plant vigor was qualified as a function of the general state of the plot, its uniformity and sanity. Nodulation was evaluated considering number, weight, size and localization of the nodules. A harvest sample was used for determining: yield components, nodule number, pod number, NG (grain number) and PG (grain weight). Results were assessed by variance partition, mean comparison and regression analysis. Table 5 below depict the variables for nodulation, while Tables 6 and 7 show the yield, its components and other parameters determined during the crop cycle. Growth stages (R3, R4, or R5) were established following by Fehr and Caviness definitions (Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. F., Burmood, D. T., Pennington, J. S., 1971. Beans yield assessment was determined after soybean seeds were subjected to biological treatments. The results obtained for the field assay in Pergamino are illustrated in Although rainfalls were scarce during the field assay described in this Example, the yield components were able to be sustained. Both the initial reserve and the rainfalls by the end of the cycle allowed a moderate impact on hydric stress. Yields achieved a mean of 4234.6 kg ha−1(Table 7 and Differences among yields were statistically significant (P=0.08; cv=6.9%). A set of three treatments, namely: Nodulation had a medium to good quality. Clearly, the lack of rainfall limited plant nodulation. Treatments inoculated with It can be clearly seen that the use of According to the results obtained in the field assay described in this example, the biological treatment used in soybean leads to an important enhancement in several crop parameters, showing a high compatibility of the microorganisms comprised in the inoculum of the invention, It should be noted that the biological inoculant of the invention generated better results in comparison with the reference bio-pesticide (commercial product Rizoderma™) even in a 6-fold lower dose concentration, thus showing an enhanced effect of the formulation. The molecular analysis of the mode of action of the bio-inoculant of the invention was performed by differential proteomics by using Label Free Quantitation analysis technique, in order to molecularly identify which are the mechanisms that lead to a pre-activation state of the plant defense systems as a consequence of the treatment with the bio-inoculant of the present invention. On the other hand, the accumulation of said defense metabolites was measured. Differential proteomics studies allow an analysis of the group of proteins that are affected in two different situations when comparing soybean plants infected with For this study, 12 soybean plants inoculated at sowing with the inoculant of this invention were used in each treatment. Nine days after germination plants were infected with The protocols followed for the different assays are described below: Protein Extraction A biological extract was obtained from the 0.5 leaf treatment with 1 ml of extraction buffer [BE: CHAPS (4% p/v), EDTA (10 mM), protease inhibitors (SigmaFast, Sigma Aldrich), in Tris-HCl (100 mM, pH=8.0)]. Then, the insoluble vegetal material was eliminated by centrifugation at 4° C. for 30 minutes at 15000 rpm. 200 μL supernatant aliquots were conserved for freezing at −20° C. Acetone Protein Precipitation The protein content in 200 μl aliquots of each extract was precipitated with 1 ml of cold acetone (−20° C.). They were incubated during 2 hours at −20° C. and a 30 minutes centrifugation at 4° C. and 15000 rpm was performed. The obtained precipitate was washed twice with 1 ml of cold acetone (−20° C.). The precipitated proteins were dissolved in 200 μl of BE and the insoluble material was eliminated by centrifugation at 4° C. during 30 minutes at 15000 rpm. The protein extract was conserved at −20° C. Analysis by Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry Each of the samples, analyzed in triplicate, underwent a trypsin enzymatic digestion. Then, 2 μg of said digested was subjected to a liquid nanocromatography coupled to mass spectrometry in tandem. A C18, 2 μm, 100 A, 50 μm×150 mm [Thermo Scientific, Easy-Spray ColumnPepMap RSLC (P/N ES801)] column was used using the EASY-nLC 1000 system of Thermo Scientific, and Q-Exactive Thermo Scientific mass spectrometer. A first analysis of the results demonstrated the differential effect of the bio-inoculant of the present invention on soybean plants at the molecular level. A dendrogram is shown in The hierarchical grouping of all samples showing the set of proteins expressed in the tested plants reveals a greater similarity between the plants previously treated with the bio-inoculant of the invention and those plants that were not inoculated, respectively. Based on proteomic analysis, infected and non-infected plants treated with the inventive bio-inoculant displayed a close relationship in the hierarchical tree, suggesting a reduction of the severity of the effects of the pathogen as a consequence of the protective effect of the bio-inoculant of the invention. When performing a statistical analysis of the proteomic results from crops infected with the pathogen (with and without treatment with the inventive bio-inoculant, respectively) two groups of proteins could be differentiated, one that is quantitatively increased (up-regulated) and the other diminished (down-regulated). Each of these two protein sets were grouped in functional clusters. A volcano plot illustrating these two groups of proteins is shown in Based on this analysis, the present inventors were able to establish in a precise way the existence of a differential pattern in the routes and cellular mechanisms involved in the pre-activation of the defense processes of the plant against pathogenic agents when the seeds are previously treated with the bio-inoculant of the invention. A methanolic extract was obtained by first treating 0.5 g leaves powder of each of the treatments depicted in Table 8 of Example 5 above, with 3 ml of acidic methanol (1% HCl), followed by incubation at room temperature for 8 hours and two minutes centrifugation at 3,000×g. Subsequently, defense metabolites present in the supernatant were measured by spectrometry, measuring the absorbance at 320 nm, 360 nm and 517 nm for determining flavonoids, hydroxycinnamic acid (HCAD) derivatives and anthocyanins respectively. Thus, the relative values thereof were determined with respect to the control ( When evaluating the accumulation of defense metabolites, the results obtained correlate with what was observed by proteomics analysis. As expected, synthesis of defense metabolites is activated following pathogen infection; however, a previous inoculation with the bio-inoculant of the present invention enables the plant with an enhanced defensive response having higher levels of antimicrobial metabolites. A biological inoculant having both fertilizing and fungicidal activity is disclosed. More particularly, a bio-inoculant having the said combined effects, comprising Bradyrhizobium japonicum and specific isolates from the Trichoderma genus is disclosed. The bio-inoculant is applied to soybean crops for preventing fungi borne diseases. More particularly, the bio-inoculant of the invention is useful for protecting soybean crops against infection by Fusarium sp., Colletotrichum sp., Cercospora sp., Sclerotinia sp. and Rhizoctonia sp. 1. A biological inoculant comprising
a) b) a 2. The biological inoculant according to 3. The biological inoculant according to 4. The biological inoculant according to 5. Use of the biological inoculant according to 6. Use according to 7. Use according to 8. A method for protecting agricultural crop plants against the infection by phytopathogenic fungi, the method comprising applying the biological inoculant according to 9. The method according to 10. The method according to FIELD OF THE INVENTION
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Determination of Antagonist Capacity of Isolated
Example 2
Characterization of Interaction of Isolated
Root development and natural nodulation of soybean plants treated with strains Trch3, Trch22 and Trch47. Strains were inoculated in soybean seedlings and the different parameters were assessed when plants developed the fifth tripholium. Control plants are soybean plants receiving no treatment. Root weight Nodules/gr root Functional (%) Control 1.4 ± 3 gr 24.5 ± 5 70 ± 10 Trch3 1.9 ± 3 gr 34.9 ± 10 71 ± 5 Trch22 1.7 ± 2 gr 27.4 ± 5 80 ± 10 Trch47 1.8 ± 4 gr 31.8 ± 8 75 ± 8 Example 3
Seed treatment and soybean canopy growth—Pergamino field test Seed treatment Dose T1 Control T2 Thiram + Carbendazim d1 1 ml kg−1 T3 Thiram + Carbendazim d3 3 ml kg−1 T4 (Bio-inoculant of the invention) 1 ml kg−1 T6 Metalaxyl + Fluodioxinil + Thiabendazole 1 ml kg−1 Protection treatments on seeds using either chemical agents or biological inoculant in soybean. Plant number (15 days after sowing), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) by Green seeker, nodule and pod number, radiation interception and vigor are depicted. No. of plants Green Nodes/ Interception Treatment 15 d.a.s. Seeker R4 ® plant Pod/plant (%) Vigor T1: Control 31.3 0.86 10.0 40.0 79.1 3.0 T2: ThC (1 ml/kg) 32.1 0.86 11.5 46.5 79.4 3.1 T3: ThC (3 ml/Kg) 31.5 0.85 12.0 45.0 90.3 3.1 T4: Bio-inoculant of 33.5 0.86 13.0 47.5 85.4 3.6 the invention T6: Met + Fluod + 35.0 0.87 12.0 44.0 85.6 3.5 Thiab R2 vs Yield 0.88 0.58 0.68 0.42 0.29 0.86 ThC: Thiram + Carbendazim; Bio-inoculant of the invention: Met: Metalaxyl; Fluod: Fluodioxinil; Thiab: Thiabendazole. Example 4
Inoculant Efficiency on Soybean Crops in the Field
Chemical and biological treatment on soybean seeds. Pergamino field assay. Seed treatment Dose T1 Control T2 Thiram + Carbendazim d1 1 ml kg−1 T3 Thiram + Carbendazim d3 3 ml kg−1 T4 (Bio-inoculant of the invention) 1 ml kg−1 T5 Commercial product 6 ml kg−1 T6 Metalaxyl + Fluodioxinil + Thiabendazole 1 ml kg−1 Commercial product: Rizoderma ™ Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of nodulation. Treatments on seeds with nitrogen -fixing bacteria, chemical fungicides and the plant growth promoter Pergamino, field assay. 10 plants per lot were evaluated in the 4 repeats. Nodule Nodule Local- Func- number size ization tionality T Treatments (1) (2) (3) (4) T1 Control 2 2 2 3 T2 Thiram + 3 2 3 3 Carbendazim d1 T3 Thiram + 3 2 4 3 Carbendazim d3 T4 (Bio-inoculant of 2 3 3 3 the invention) T5 Commercial product 4 3 4 2 T6 Metalaxyl + 3 3 2 3 Fluodioxinil + Thiabendazole R2vs yield 0.06 0.62 0.16 0.12 Commercial product: Rizoderma ™ 1Nodule number: 1: null, 2: scarce, 3: medium, 4: high, 5: very high. 2Nodule size: 1: very little, 2: little, 3: medium size, 4: large size, 5: very large size. 3Localization: 1: totally in secondary roots, 2: mostly in secondary roots, 3: equal distribution in main root: secondary root, 4: mostly in main root, 5: nodules totally located in main root. 4Functionality: 1: completely green or brown tonality, 2: mostly green or brown tonality, 3: diverse tonality, 4: mostly redish tonality, 5: redish tonality in all nodules. Plant density (plants per m2), NDVI as measured by Green seeker, nodule and pod number, radiation interception, vigor, plant height (cm), Nitrogen content as estimated by Spad, grain yield, components and response over control. Treatments on seeds with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, chemical fungicides and the plant growth promoter Plant Green Nodules/ Pods/ 1Interception Treatment density Seeker R4 plant plant R4 (%) 2Vigor Control 24.5 0.81 15.0 58.0 87.8 3.5 Thiram + Carbendazim d1 25.5 0.84 17.5 60.0 87.8 3.8 Thiram + Carbendazim d3 22.4 0.83 16.0 67.5 87.7 3.8 24.1 0.83 16.5 68.5 89.0 3.8 inoculant of the invention) Commercial product 26.0 0.82 17.0 62.5 86.3 3.7 Metalaxyl + Fluodioxinil + 22.3 0.83 16.0 71.0 87.4 3.7 Thiabendazole R2vs Yield 0.01 0.33 0.36 0.32 0.02 0.45 Commercial product: Rizoderma ™ 1Interception: evaluated as % of maximum incident radiation. 2Vigor index: according to the following score 1: minimum - 5: maximum. It evaluates sanity, plant size and lot uniformity. Plant height (cm), nitrogen content as estimated by Spad, bean yield, components and response over control. Treatments on seeds with nitrogen- fixing bacteria, chemical fungicides and the plant growth promoter Plants Bean Bean Diff vs height Spad at Yield Yield Weight Control Treatment (cm) R3 (kg ha−1) (NG) (PG) (kg ha−1) Control 97 45.1 3977.3 2840.9 140 Thiram + Carbendazim d1 96 47.3 4199.4 3065.2 137 222.1 Thiram + Carbendazim d3 97 44.9 4174.2 3024.8 138 196.9 98 45.4 4459.6 3303.4 135 482.3 inoculant of the invention) Commercial product 97 45.5 4348.8 3245.3 134 371.5 Metalaxyl + Fluodioxinil + Thiabendazole 93 45.6 4248.1 3170.2 134 270.8 R2vs Yield 0.02 0.01 0.97 0.70 P = 0.08 CV (%) 4.94 Commercial product: Rizoderma ™ Example 5
Molecular Analysis of the Mode of Action of the Bio-Inoculant of the Invention
Treatments. Bio-inoculant Bio-inoculant of of the the invention + Control Pathogen invention Pathogen Bio-inoculant of − − + + the invention − + − + Example 6
Evaluation of the Accumulation of Defense Metabolites in Soybean Plants
SEQ ID NO: 1 >Trch3 TGTGAACGTTACCAAACTGTTGCCTCGGCGGGATCTCTGCCCCGGGTGCG TCGCAGCCCCGGACCAAGGCGCCCGCCGGAGGACCAACCAAAACTCTTAT TGTATACCCCCTCGCGGGTTTTTTTATAATCTGAGCCTTCTCGGCGCCTC TCGTAGGCGTTTCGAAAATGAATCAAAACTTTCAACAACGGATCTCTTGG TTCTGGCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGCGAAATGCGATAAGTAATGTGAATTG CAGAATTCAGTGAATCATCGAATCTTTGAACGCACATTGCGCCCGCCAGT ATTCTGGCGGGCATGCCTGTCCGAGCGTCATTTCAACCCTCGAACCCCTC CGGGGGGTCGGCGTTGGGGATCGGCCCTGCCTTGGCGGTGGCCGTCTCCG AAATACAGTGGCGGTCTCGCCGCAGCCTCTCCTGCGCAGTAGTTTGCACA CTCGCATCGGGAGCGCGGCGCGTCCACAGCCGTTAAACACCCAACTTCTG AAATGTTGACCTCGGATCAGGTAGGAATACCCGCTGAACTTAAGCATATC AAAAA SEQ ID NO: 2 >Trch22 TGTGAACGTTACCAAACTGTTGCCTCGGCGGGATCTCTGCCCCGGGTGCG TCGCAGCCCCGGACCAAGGCGCCCGCCGGAGGACCAACCAAAACTCTTAT TGTATACCCCCTCGCGGGTTTTTTTATAATCTGAGCCTTCTCGGCGCCTC TCGTAGGCGTTTCGAAAATGAATCAAAACTTTCAACAACGGATCTCTTGG TTCTGGCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGCGAAATGCGATAAGTAATGTGAATTG CAGAATTCAGTGAATCATCGAATCTTTGAACGCACATTGCGCCCGCCAGT ATTCTGGCGGGCATGCCTGTCCGAGCGTCATTTCAACCCTCGAACCCCTC CGGGGGGTCGGCGTTGGGGATCGGCCCTGCCTTGGCGGTGGCCGTCTCCG AAATACAGTGGCGGTCTCGCCGCAGCCTCTCCTGCGCAGTAGTTTGCACA CTCGCATCGGGAGCGCGGCGCGTCCACAGCCGTTAAACACCCAACTTCTG AAATGTTGACCTCGGATCAGGTAGGAATACCCGCTGAACTTAAGCATAAG AAAAA SEQ ID NO: 3 >Trch47 TGTGAACGTTACCAAACTGTTGCCTCGGCGGGATCTCTGCCCCGGGTGCG TCGCAGCCCCGGACCAAGGCGCCCGCCGGAGGACCAACCAAAACTCTTAT TGTATACCCCCTCGCGGGTTTTTTTATAATCTGAGCCTTCTCGGCGCCTC TCGTAGGCGTTTCGAAAATGAATCAAAACTTTCAACAACGGATCTCTTGG TTCTGGCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGCGAAATGCGATAAGTAATGTGAATTG CAGAATTCAGTGAATCATCGAATCTTTGAACGCACATTGCGCCCGCCAGT ATTCTGGCGGGCATGCCTGTCCGAGCGTCATTTCAACCCTCGAACCCCTC CGGGGGGTCGGCGTTGGGGATCGGCCCTGCCTTGGCGGTGGCCGTCTCCG AAATACAGTGGCGGTCTCGCCGCAGCCTCTCCTGCGCAGTAGTTTGCACA CTCGCATCGGGAGCGCGGCGCGTCCACAGCCGTTAAACACCCAACTTCTG AAATGTTGACCTCGGATCAGGTAGGAATACCCGCTGAACTTAAGCATATA AATAA



