GAS DEACIDIZING METHOD USING AN ABSORBENT SOLUTION WITH COS REMOVAL THROUGH HYDROLYSIS
1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to deacidification methods of using an absorbent solution. Absorption methods using an aqueous amine solution are commonly used to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from a gas. The gas is purified by contact with the absorbent solution and then the absorbent solution is thermally regenerated. Carbonyl sulfide (COS) can be present in a natural gas, as well as in a synthesis gas. Conventional chemical solvents do not allow the COS to be efficiently removed. In any case, conventional chemical solvents do not allow the H2S and the COS to be selectively removed in relation to CO2. In the case of natural gas treatment, a significant presence of COS in the feed gas is often problematic and a stringent total sulfur specification in the treated gas is constrained by the COS content in the feed gas. In the case of a synthesis gas, and according to the downstream applications of the gas, COS is often considered to be a pollutant and the treated gas must have very low COS contents, down to less than 1 ppm. 2. Description of the Prior Art WO-96/19,281 describes treatment of an acidic natural gas by carrying out catalytic hydrolysis of COS between two absorption stages. The catalytic hydrolysis reactor is arranged outside the absorption column. The gas phase hydrolysis reaction is as follows: The reaction is thus promoted for low H2S and CO2partial pressures. WO-96/19,281 thus describes reduction of the H2S partial pressure before COS hydrolysis by carrying out an absorption stage in the lower section of the absorption column. Then the acid gases are removed at the hydrolysis reactor outlet through absorption in the upper section of the absorption column. The present invention improves the method described in WO-96/19,281 by optimizing the distribution of the absorbent solution streams in the absorption section. In general terms, the present invention provides a method of deacidifying a gas comprising H2S and COS, by the following stages: (a) contacting the gas with a first absorbent solution stream in a first absorption section to obtain an H2S-depleted gaseous effluent and an H2S-laden absorbent solution; (b) feeding the H2S-depleted gaseous effluent into a reactor that performs a reaction of hydrolysis of the COS into H2S and CO2to obtain a COS-depleted gaseous effluent; (c) contacting the COS-depleted gaseous effluent with a second absorbent solution stream in a second absorption section to obtain a treated gas and an absorbent solution partly laden with H2S; and (d) regenerating the H2S-laden absorbent solution to obtain a regenerated absorbent solution stream. According to the invention, in stage (a), the first absorbent solution stream comprises a first portion of the regenerated absorbent solution obtained in stage (d), as well as the absorbent solution partly laden with H2S, and in stage (c) the second absorbent solution stream comprises a second portion of the regenerated absorbent solution stream obtained in stage (d). According to the invention, the first portion can comprise at least 70 vol. % of the regenerated absorbent solution stream obtained in stage (d) and the second portion can comprise less than 30 vol. % of the regenerated absorbent solution stream obtained in stage (d). The pressure in the first absorption section can be at least 2 bars above the pressure in the second absorption section and, in this case, the pressure can be raised by pumping the absorbent solution partly laden with H2S prior to feeding it into the first absorption section. The reactor can, for example, comprise a COS hydrolysis reaction catalyst, a titanium oxide or an alumina oxide. The regenerated absorbent solution stream can comprise at least one amine in aqueous phase. In stage (d), the H2S-laden absorbent solution can be subjected to at least one distillation. In stage (d), the H2S-laden absorbent solution can also be subjected to expansion. The gas can be selected from among a natural gas, and a synthesis gas, a combustion fume. Applying a limited absorbent solution flow rate in stage (c) allows significant reduction of the diameter of the second absorption section while keeping the COS specifications. This involves a significant decrease in the cost of the absorber and a decrease in the operating cost of the method. Other features and advantages of the invention will be clear from reading the description hereafter, with reference to With reference to The gas to be treated flowing in through line 1 is contacted in absorption section C1 The composition of the absorbent solution is selected for its capacity to absorb the acidic compounds. An absorbent solution comprising a chemical solvent can be used, for example a solution comprising in general between 10 wt. % and 80 wt. %, preferably between 20 wt. % and 60 wt. % amines, preferably alkanolamines, and comprising at least 20 wt. % water, the sum of the compounds being 100%. The following amines can be used: MEA (monoethanolamine), DEA (diethanolamine), MDEA (methyldiethanolamine), DIPA (diisopropylamine), DGA (diglycolamine), diamines, piperazine, hydroxyethyl piperazine. An amine type or a mixture of several amines can be used, for example a mixture of one or more tertiary amines with one or more primary or secondary amines. Alternatively, an absorbent solution comprising a physical solvent can be used, for example methanol, N-formyl morpholine, glycol ethers, sulfolane, thiodiethanol. The physical solvent can be mixed with an aforementioned chemical solvent and/or with water. If it is desired to selectively absorb the H2S in relation to CO2, an absorbent solution comprising a solvent with thermodynamic and kinetic properties that confer a selective character on the absorbent solution can be used. It is possible to use an amine whose intrinsic characteristics are a rate of reaction with H2S that is at least twice, or even three times as high as its rate of reaction with CO2. For example, the absorbent solution comprises a tertiary amine, MDEA for example, or an amine comprising a sterically hindered amine function, DIPA for example. The selective absorbent solution can comprise between 10 wt. % and 80 wt. %, preferably between 20 wt. % and 60 wt. % amines, and at least 20 wt. % water with the sum of the compounds being 100%. It is also possible, for example, to use a selective physical solvent in aqueous solution, such as dimethyl ether polyethylene glycol or N-methylpyrrolidone. In the case of natural gas treatment, section C1 The gas circulating in line 9 is heated in heat exchangers E3 and E4. Exchangers E3 and E4 allow recovery of the heat contained in the hot gas from reactor R1 in order to thermally best optimize the method according to the invention. The heated gas coming from E4 through line 11 can be sent, in some cases, to an additional heat exchanger E5 allowing reaching temperature levels required for the hydrolysis stage carried out in R1. The hot gas leaving E5 through line 12 is fed into catalytic reactor R1. For example, R1 is a fixed bed reactor whose catalyst can be a titanium oxide, an alumina oxide or a zirconium oxide. The catalyst comes in solid form, such as, for example, extrudates. Preferably, a catalyst CRS31 is used which is marketed by the Axens Company. Under the effect of the catalyst, the COS contained in the water-saturated gas is converted to H2S and CO2according to the hydrolysis reaction as follows: COS+H2OH2S+CO2. In general, reactor R1 can operate at a pressure ranging between 20 and 100 bars, and at a temperature at least above 100° C. The gas discharged from reactor R1 through line 13 is significantly depleted in COS, and contains CO2and H2S produced by hydrolysis of the COS. The gas is cooled in exchangers E4, then E3, by heat exchange with the gas coming from C1 The cooled gas leaving E6 through line 16 is fed into absorption section C1 Sections C1 The absorbent solution discharged in the bottom of section C1 According to the invention, at the outlet of exchanger E2, the stream circulating in line 2 is pumped by pump P2, then divided into two portions which are a main portion circulating in 2 The main portion of the regenerated absorbent solution 2 The method operation example according to The method according to Table 1 shows that the gas at the reactor outlet allows the COS specification to be reached while limiting the pressure drop. Table 2 gives all the stream compositions and operating conditions obtained by means of a numerical process simulation software specific to gas-liquid absorption columns. This example shows that a certain selectivity can be kept for the treated gas while removing the COS present in the natural gas. Furthermore, this example shows that a low flow rate of absorbent solution 2 Table 3 also shows the relevance of the method according to the invention in the instance of selective absorption of H2S in relation to CO2in natural gas. Whereas the method according to WO-96/19,281 contains 1.2% CO2in the treated gas, the method according to the invention allows keeping 1.6% CO2, which is close to the 2% CO2content sought in natural gas to be carried in a gas pipeline. The economic considerations presented hereafter in Table 4 have been determined considering the cost of the main equipments (absorption column, regeneration column, heat exchangers, pump, reactor). Table 4 gives the dimensions of the absorption column dimensioned according to the diagram of The method according to the invention allows reduction of the cost of column C1 by 23%. The method according to the invention also allows reduction of the energy consumption of pump P1 as shown in Table 5. The method according to the invention allows achieving stringent specifications regarding COS content of the treated gas and to reduce the dimensions of the absorption column, which is the highest investment in the case of deacidifying natural gas. The gains obtained regarding the costs are significant. The method also allows improving the H2S content selectivity in relation to CO2in the treated gas, in cases where an absorbent solution comprising a selective amine that selectively absorbs H2S in relation to CO2is used. This advantage of the method according to the invention, is that unlike the prior art conventional methods of COS removal using a non-selective chemical or physical solvent which are ineffective to achieve stringent specifications, the invention has the capacity of selectively removing H2S and COS in relation to CO2, which cannot be obtained with conventional methods allowing COS removal. The method deacidifies a gas including H2S and CO2. The gas is subjected to an absorption to collect the CO2 and the H2S in an absorber, then to conversion through hydrolysis of the COS to H2S and CO2 in a reactor, and to a second absorption to collect the H2S and the CO2 formed in the reactor. The absorbent solution is regenerated in regenerator. The regenerated absorbent solution is separated into two which are: a main stream supplying the absorber, and a remaining stream supplying the second absorption 1-11. (canceled) 12. A method of deacidizing a gas comprising H2S and COS, comprising:
a) contacting the gas with a first absorbent solution stream in a first absorption section to obtain an H2S-depleted gaseous effluent and an H2S-laden absorbent solution; (b) feeding the H2S-depleted gaseous effluent into a reactor comprising a solid catalyst that performs a reaction of hydrolysis of the COS to H2S and CO2to obtain a COS-depleted gaseous effluent; (c) contacting the COS-depleted gaseous effluent with a second absorbent solution stream in a second absorption section to obtain a treated gas and an absorbent solution partly laden with H2S; and (d) regenerating the H2S-laden absorbent solution to obtain a regenerated absorbent solution stream; and wherein in (a), the first absorbent solution stream comprises a first portion of the regenerated absorbent solution obtained in (d), as well as an absorbent solution partly laden with H2S, and in (c) a second absorbent solution stream comprises a second portion of the regenerated absorbent solution stream obtained in (d). 13. A method as claimed in 14. A method as claimed in 15. A method as claimed in 16. A method as claimed in 17. A method as claimed in 18. A method as claimed in 19. A method as claimed in 20. A method as claimed in 21. A method as claimed in 22. A method as claimed in 23. A method as claimed in 24. A method as claimed in 25. A method as claimed in 26. A method as claimed in 27. A method as claimed in 28. A method as claimed in 29. A method as claimed in 30. A method as claimed in 31. A method as claimed in 32. A method as claimed in 33. A method as claimed in 34. A method as claimed in 35. A method as claimed in 36. A method as claimed in 37. A method as claimed in 38. A method as claimed in 39. A method as claimed in 40. A method as claimed in 41. A method as claimed in 42. A method as claimed in 43. A method as claimed in 44. A method as claimed in 45. A method as claimed in 46. A method as claimed in 47. A method as claimed in 48. A method as claimed in 49. A method as claimed in BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
COS+H2OH2S+CO2SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Stream number Description 12 13 R1 inlet R1 outlet Temp. (° C.) 140 140.05 Pressure (Bar) 75.5 74.0 Molar flow rate 2717.7 2717.7 (kmol/h) Mass flow rate 58783.8 58783.8 (kg/h) Comp. (% mol) CO2 2.027 2.0353 H2S 0.0002 0.0083 COS 0.0081 0.0001 H2O 0.1738 0.1658 N2 0.268 0.268 C1 89.188 89.188 C2 4.892 4.892 C3+ 3.443 3.443 Stream number Description 2a 2b 3 1 Amines Amines Treated Raw gas to C1a to C1b gas Temp. (° C.) 37.6 47.6 47 48.3 Pressure (Bar) 76.2 75.9 73.8 73.8 Volume flow 75 000 320 45 63603 rate (Sm3/h) Mass flow rate 68896.4 334566 47048 50295.3 (kg/h) Comp. (% mol) CO2 9.6 0.0128 0.0128 1.6 H2S 6.0 0.01 0.01 0.0003 COS 0.0075 — — 0.0001 H2O 0.12 88.7 88.7 0.1965 MDEA 11.3 11.3 N2 0.23 0.2692 C1 76.83 89.5463 C2 4.235 4.9071 C3+ 2.977 3.48 Stream number 3 (treated gas) 3 (treated gas) Comp. (%) CO2 1.2 1.6 H2S 2 4 COS (ppm) 1 1 Height (m) 28 28 Diameter (m) upper section 2400 2350 Diameter (m) lower section 2400 1400 cost (M ) 2.47 1.9 gain on cost (%) 23 Cost k 41 11 Gain (%) 73 Consumption (kW) 32 4 Gain (%) 87.5 CONCLUSIONS
