TREATMENT COMPOSITION FOR CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING, CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING METHOD, AND CLEANING METHOD

26-04-2018 дата публикации
Номер:
US20180111248A1
Принадлежит: JSR CORPORATION
Контакты:
Номер заявки: 85-82-1556
Дата заявки: 30-03-2016

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001]

The present invention relates to a treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing, a chemical mechanical polishing method, and a cleaning method.

BACKGROUND ART

[0002]

In recent years, along with miniaturization of a semiconductor device, a wiring layer including wiring, a plug, and the like formed in the semiconductor device has been increasingly fine. Along with this, a planarization technique through chemical mechanical polishing (hereinafter may be called “CMP”) has been used for the wiring layer. As such technique, there is known, for example, a damascene process involving depositing a conductive metal, such as aluminum, copper, or tungsten, in a fine trench or hole formed in an insulating film made of silicon oxide or the like on a semiconductor substrate by a method such as sputtering or plating, and then removing an excessively deposited metal film by CMP to leave the metal only in the fine trench or hole portion (see, for example, Patent Literature 1).

[0003]

In this process, tungsten, which is excellent in embedding property, is used as a material particularly for, for example, a plug to electrically connect wires to each other in an upper and lower vertical direction. In chemical mechanical polishing for forming the tungsten plug, a first polishing treatment step of mainly polishing a tungsten layer formed on an insulating film, and a second polishing treatment step of polishing the tungsten plug, a barrier metal film made of titanium or the like, and the insulating film are sequentially performed.

[0004]

With regard to such chemical mechanical polishing of the tungsten layer and the tungsten plug (hereinafter may be called “tungsten film”), for example, in Patent Literature 2, as a semiconductor polishing composition to be used in a stage before finishing polishing corresponding to the first polishing treatment step, there is a disclosure of a semiconductor polishing composition that is intended to provide a high polishing rate and prevent surface roughening of a wafer surface after polishing due to high reactivity between an amine compound serving as a polishing accelerator and silicon, and that contains: abrasive grains, such as colloidal silica; a basic low-molecular-weight compound, such as an amine compound; and a water-soluble polymer compound containing a nitrogen-containing group, such as polyethyleneimine.

[0005]

In addition, in Patent Literature 3, there is a disclosure of a chemical mechanical polishing method for a substrate containing tungsten, involving performing polishing using a chemical mechanical polishing composition containing: a tungsten etchant, such as an oxidizing agent; an inhibitor of tungsten etching, which is a specific polymer or the like containing a nitrogen atom, and is present in an amount of from 1 ppm to 1,000 ppm; and water. The chemical mechanical polishing composition to be used in this polishing method may contain, as optional components, an abrasive, such as colloidal silica, and compounds such as monopersulfates (SO52−) and dipersulfates (S2O82−).

[0006]

Meanwhile, along with extremely high integration of the semiconductor device in recent years, even contamination with an extremely small amount of impurities has largely affected the performance of the device, and by extension, a product yield. For example, on the surface of an uncleaned 8-inch wafer after completion of CMP, the number of particles each having a diameter of 0.2 μm or more to be counted is 10,000 or more, and there is a demand for removal of the particles to several to dozens of pieces through cleaning. In addition, the concentration of metal impurities (the number of impurity atoms per square centimeter) on the surface is from 1×1011 to 1×1012 or more, and there is a demand for removal of the metal impurities to 1×1010 or less through the cleaning. Therefore, when CMP is introduced in the production of the semiconductor device, the cleaning after CMP is an inevitable and essential step.

[0007]

Further, in an advanced node semiconductor substrate in which the tungsten layer and the tungsten plug are miniaturized, the wiring and the plug each have a size of from about several tens to about a hundred and several tens of tungsten atoms in width or diameter, and hence generation of even a fine pit at an atomic level having a diameter equivalent to several tens of tungsten atoms causes severe electrical characteristic failure. Therefore, recently, in any of a finishing polishing step (so-called polishing step), a cleaning step on a platen after polishing, and a post-cleaning step in a cleaning apparatus, there has emerged a need for a corrosion suppression technology for preventing the tungsten film from being eluted at the atomic level (see, for example, Patent Literature 4).

CITATION LIST

Patent Literature

[0008]

PTL 1: JP-T-2002-518845

[0009]

PTL 2: JP-A-2007-19093

[0010]

PTL 3: JP-T-2008-503875

[0011]

PTL 4: WO2013-162020

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Technical Problem

[0012]

However, the above-mentioned technology has not been sufficient as a tungsten film polishing composition capable of achieving the reduction of corrosion of a surface to be polished while maintaining a high polishing rate. In addition, the technology has not been sufficient as a tungsten film cleaning composition capable of achieving both the removal of foreign matter on a surface to be cleaned and the reduction of corrosion.

[0013]

In view of the foregoing, according to some aspects of the invention, there are provided, by solving the above-mentioned problems, a chemical mechanical polishing composition and chemical mechanical polishing method for polishing, in a semiconductor device manufacturing process, an object to be treated, such as a semiconductor wafer, including a wiring layer containing a metal, such as tungsten, in particular, a surface to be treated of the object to be treated, where a tungsten film and an insulating film, such as a silicon oxide film, coexist, while reducing corrosion of the surface of the tungsten film without lowering a polishing rate.

[0014]

There are also provided a cleaning composition capable of efficiently removing a metal oxide film and an organic residue on a surface to be treated obtained by chemical mechanical polishing using the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing while reducing corrosion of the surface to be treated, and a cleaning method for a substrate involving using the cleaning composition.

Solution to Problem

[0015]

The invention has been made in order to solve at least part of the above-mentioned problems, and can be realized as the following aspects or application examples.

Application Example 1

[0016]

A treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to one aspect of the invention includes a treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing, for treating an object to be treated including a wiring layer containing a metal, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing containing:

[0017]

(A) a nitrogen-containing compound;

[0018]

(B) at least one kind of compound selected from the group consisting of a surfactant and polyacrylic acid; and

[0019]

(D) a pH adjusting agent,

[0020]

in which in terms of electrode charge transfer resistance value obtained by AC impedance measurement using the metal for an electrode, which is a value (D/cm2) obtained by

[0021]

bonding an insulating tape to a central 1 cm×1 cm portion of a metal wafer cut to 1 cm×3 cm,

[0022]

attaching an electrode clip to an upper 1 cm×1 cm exposed area of the metal wafer,

[0023]

connecting the metal wafer to a measurement apparatus with a controlled AC voltage,

[0024]

immersing a lower 1 cm×1 cm exposed area of the metal wafer in an aqueous solution for 5 minutes,

[0025]

applying an AC voltage having an amplitude of 5 mV and a frequency of from 1,500 Hz to 0.5 Hz changing from a higher frequency to a lower frequency to obtain values for a real part and an imaginary part of a resistance value,

[0026]

plotting the imaginary part on a vertical axis and the real part on a horizontal axis, and

[0027]

analyzing the resultant semicircular plot with AC impedance analysis software,

[0028]

a value (RA+RB) obtained by summing up an electrode charge transfer resistance value (RA) in an aqueous solution containing the component (A) and the pH adjusting agent (D), and an electrode charge transfer resistance value (RB) in an aqueous solution containing the component (B) and the pH adjusting agent (D), and an electrode charge transfer resistance value (RC) in an aqueous solution containing the component (A), the component (B), and the pH adjusting agent (D) have a relationship of RC/(RA+RB)>1.

Application Example 2

[0029]

In the above-mentioned Application Example, the nitrogen-containing compound (A) may include at least one kind selected from the group consisting of compounds represented by the following general formulae (1) to (3):

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (1), R1 and R2 each independently represent a functional group selected from a hydrogen atom and an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms;

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (2), R3 represents any one functional group selected from the group consisting of a hydrogen atom, an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that contains a nitrogen atom, and an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group; and

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (3), one or more of R4 to R7 each represent an organic group having 1 to 3 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group, and others of R4 to R7 each represent a hydrogen atom.

Application Example 3

[0030]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the component (A) may include the compound represented by the general formula (1), and the component (B) may include an anionic surfactant or polyacrylic acid.

Application Example 4

[0031]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the anionic surfactant may include at least one kind selected from the group consisting of potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, a dipotassium alkenylsuccinate, and octyl phosphoric acid ester.

Application Example 5

[0032]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the component (A) may include the compound represented by the general formula (2) in which R3 represents an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that contains a nitrogen atom, and

[0033]

the component (B) may include a surfactant having a sulfo group.

Application Example 6

[0034]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the surfactant having a sulfo group may include an alkylbenzenesulfonic acid or a salt thereof.

Application Example 7

[0035]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the component (A) may include the compound represented by the general formula (2) in which R3 represents an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group, or the compound represented by the general formula (3), and

[0036]

the component (B) may include a betaine-based surfactant having a carboxyl group.

Application Example 8

[0037]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the component (B) may include at least one kind selected from the group consisting of compounds represented by the following general formulae (4), (5), and (6):

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (4), R8 to R10 each independently represent any one functional group selected from the group consisting of hydrocarbon groups each having 1 to 15 carbon atoms, and R11 represents a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 5 carbon atoms;

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (5), R12 and R13 each independently represent any one functional group selected from the group consisting of a hydrogen atom, a hydrocarbon group having 5 to 20 carbon atoms, an organic group having 5 to 20 carbon atoms that has an amide group, an organic group having 5 to 20 carbon atoms that has an amino group, an organic group having 5 to 20 carbon atoms that has an imide group, an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group, and an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a hydroxyl group, and R14 represents a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 5 carbon atoms; and

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (6), R15 and R16 each independently represent any one functional group selected from the group consisting of a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 20 carbon atoms, and an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a hydroxyl group, and R17 represents a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 5 carbon atoms.

Application Example 9

[0038]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the component (A) may include at least one kind selected from the group consisting of quinolinic acid, histidine, arginine, and aspartic acid, and

[0039]

the component (B) may include at least one kind selected from the group consisting of lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine, laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine, and 2-lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium betaine.

Application Example 10

[0040]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the electrode charge transfer resistance value (RC) may be set to more than 100 kΩ/cm2.

Application Example 1

[0041]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the metal may be tungsten.

Application Example 12

[0042]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the treatment composition may further contain an oxidizing agent (C).

Application Example 13

[0043]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the oxidizing agent (C) may be hydrogen peroxide or ammonium persulfate.

Application Example 14

[0044]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing may be a cleaning composition for cleaning the object to be treated.

Application Example 15

[0045]

In the above-mentioned Application Examples, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing may further contain abrasive grains (E).

Application Example 16

[0046]

In the above-mentioned Application Example, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing may be a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated.

Application Example 17

[0047]

A chemical mechanical polishing method according to one aspect of the invention includes polishing the object to be treated including a wiring layer containing a metal through use of the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing of Application Example 14.

Application Example 18

[0048]

A cleaning method according to one aspect of the invention includes cleaning the object to be treated with the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing of Application Example 12.

Application Example 19

[0049]

A treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to another aspect of the invention includes a treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing, for treating an object to be treated including a wiring layer containing a metal, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing containing:

[0050]

(A) a nitrogen-containing compound,

[0051]

(B) at least one kind of compound selected from the group consisting of a surfactant and polyacrylic acid; and

[0052]

(D) a pH adjusting agent.

Advantageous Effects of Invention

[0053]

According to the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing of the invention, in a semiconductor device manufacturing process, an object to be treated, such as a semiconductor wafer, including a wiring layer containing a metal, such as tungsten, in particular, a surface to be treated of the object to be treated, where a tungsten film and an insulating film, such as a silicon oxide film, coexist, can be polished while corrosion of the surface of the tungsten film is reduced without the lowering of a polishing rate. A metal oxide film and an organic residue on the surface to be treated can also be efficiently removed while corrosion of the surface to be treated is reduced.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0054]

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view for schematically illustrating an object to be treated suitable for use in a chemical mechanical polishing method according to one embodiment of the invention.

[0055]

FIG. 2 is a perspective view for schematically illustrating a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus suitable for use in a chemical mechanical polishing method according to one embodiment of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0056]

Preferred embodiments of the invention are described in detail below. The invention is not limited to the following embodiments, and includes various modification examples performed within the range not changing the gist of the invention.

1. Treatment Composition for Chemical Mechanical Polishing

[0057]

A treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to one embodiment of the invention is a treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing, for treating an object to be treated including a wiring layer containing a metal, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing containing: (A) a nitrogen-containing compound; (B) at least one kind of compound selected from the group consisting of a surfactant and polyacrylic acid; and (D) a pH adjusting agent. In addition, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing has features of satisfying specific conditions as described below.

[0058]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to the embodiment of the invention not only can be suitably used as a “chemical mechanical polishing composition” for polishing the object to be treated with a chemical mechanical polishing method, but also can be suitably used as a “cleaning composition” for cleaning the object to be treated after chemical mechanical polishing.

[0059]

That is, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to the embodiment of the invention has the functions of both the “chemical mechanical polishing composition” and the “cleaning composition”, and has features of satisfying specific conditions as described below. Each component contained in the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment and the like are described.

1.1. Component (A)

[0060]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment contains a nitrogen atom-containing compound as the component (A).

[0061]

The inventors speculate that in the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment, the component (A) acts as a complexing agent, and, through an interaction with the component (B) to be described later, forms an anticorrosive film having a multilayer structure on a surface to be treated including a wiring layer containing a metal, such as tungsten. Therefore, it is considered that when the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition in chemical mechanical polishing, it is possible to polish the surface to be treated while reducing corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering a polishing rate. In addition, it is considered that when the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing is used as a cleaning composition after chemical mechanical polishing, it is possible to efficiently remove a metal oxide film and an organic residue on the surface to be treated while reducing corrosion of the surface to be treated.

[0062]

It is preferred that the nitrogen-containing compound (A) be at least one kind selected from the group consisting of compounds represented by the following general formulae (1) to (3):

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (1), R1 and R2 each independently represent a functional group selected from a hydrogen atom and an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms;

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (2), R3 represents any one functional group selected from the group consisting of a hydrogen atom, an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that contains a nitrogen atom, and an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group; and

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (3), one or more of R4 to R7 each represent an organic group having 1 to 3 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group, and others of R4 to R7 each represent a hydrogen atom.

[0063]

When the component (A) is at least one kind selected from the group consisting of the compounds represented by the general formulae (1) to (3), its action as a complexing agent is improved by combination with a specific component (B) to be described later. Accordingly, a higher corrosion-reducing effect is obtained.

1.1.1. Compound Represented by General Formula (1)

[0064]

When the nitrogen atom-containing compound (A) is the compound having a piperazine skeleton represented by the general formula (1), by selecting an anionic surfactant or polyacrylic acid as the component (B), it is possible to further polish or clean the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0065]

The organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms in each of R1 and R2 in the general formula (1) is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof may include a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms, an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has an amide group, an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has an amino group, and an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a heterocyclic group. Of those, a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms or an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has an amino group is preferred.

[0066]

The compound represented by the general formula (1) is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof may include piperazine, N-(2-aminoethyl)piperazine, N,N′-bis(3-propylamino)piperazine, phenylpiperazine, diphenylpiperazine, pyridinylpiperazine, and pyrimidylpiperazine. Of those, piperazine, N-(2-aminoethyl)piperazine, and N,N′-bis(3-propylamino)piperazine are preferred. The compounds described above may be used alone or in combination thereof.

1.1.2. Compound Represented by General Formula (2)

[0067]

When the compound represented by the general formula (2) is used as the nitrogen atom-containing compound (A), the organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that contains a nitrogen atom in R3 in the general formula (2) is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof may include an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that has an amide group, an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that has an amino group, an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that has an imide group, and an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that has a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic group. Of those, an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that has an amide group, an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that has an amino group, or an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that has a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic group is preferred. In this case, by selecting a specific component (B), it is possible to further polish or clean the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0068]

When the nitrogen atom-containing compound (A) is the amino acid represented by the general formula (2), R3 in the compound represents an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that contains a nitrogen atom, and an alkylbenzenesulfonic acid or a salt thereof is selected as the component (B), it is possible to further polish or clean the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0069]

In addition, when the nitrogen atom-containing compound (A) is the amino acid represented by the general formula (2), R3 in the compound represents an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group, and at least one kind selected from the group consisting of compounds represented by the general formulae (4), (5), and (6) to be described later is selected as the component (B), it is possible to further polish or clean the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0070]

The compound represented by the general formula (2) is not particularly limited, but a preferred specific example thereof is at least one kind selected from the group consisting of histidine, arginine, aspartic acid, glycine, alanine, and lysine. In this case, it is particularly possible to polish the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate. The compounds described above may be used alone or in combination thereof.

1.1.3. Compound Represented by General Formula (3)

[0071]

When the compound represented by the general formula (3) is used as the nitrogen atom-containing compound (A), by selecting, as the component (B), at least one kind selected from the group consisting of compounds represented by the general formulae (4), (5), and (6) to be described later, it is possible to further polish or clean the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0072]

The organic group having 1 to 3 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group in each of R4 to R7 in the general formula (3) is preferably a carboxyethyl group or a carboxymethyl group. Of those, quinolinic acid is particularly preferred as the compound represented by the general formula (3). In this case, it is particularly possible to polish the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0073]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated, the content of the component (A) is 0.0001 mass % or more and 1 mass % or less, preferably 0.0005 mass % or more and 0.5 mass % or less, more preferably 0.001 mass % or more and 0.1 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the chemical mechanical polishing composition. When the content of the component (A) falls within the above-mentioned range, it is possible to more effectively polish the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0074]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a cleaning composition for cleaning the object to be treated after chemical mechanical polishing, the content of the component (A) is 0.0001 mass % or more and 1 mass % or less, preferably 0.0005 mass % or more and 0.5 mass % or less, more preferably 0.001 mass % or more and 0.05 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the cleaning composition. When the content of the component (A) falls within the above-mentioned range, it is possible to more efficiently remove a metal oxide film and an organic residue on a wiring board while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated.

1.2. Component (B)

[0075]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment contains, as the component (B), at least one kind of compound selected from the group consisting of a surfactant and polyacrylic acid. The inventors speculate that in the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment, through the interaction between the component (B) and the above-mentioned component (A), an anticorrosive film having a multilayer structure is formed on the surface to be treated including a wiring layer containing a metal, such as tungsten. Therefore, it is considered that when, for example, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition, it is possible to polish the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

1.2.1. Anionic Surfactant and Polyacrylic Acid

[0076]

When the component (A) is the compound having a piperazine skeleton represented by the general formula (1), the component (B) is preferably an anionic surfactant or polyacrylic acid. When the anionic surfactant or the polyacrylic acid is selected as the component (B), the anticorrosive film having a multilayer structure resulting from the interaction with the component (A) described above is easily formed, and hence the corrosion of the surface to be treated can be suppressed.

[0077]

More specifically, the inventors speculate as follows. That is, the compound represented by the general formula (1) serving as the component (A) forms a complex on the surface to be treated and becomes cationic under an acidic condition, and hence the component (B), which is anionic, is attracted to the component (A) by an electrostatic interaction to be adsorbed. Further, alkyl carbon chains substituting the component (B) self-assemble with each other on the surface to be treated through a hydrophobic interaction, to thereby increase the thickness of an adsorption layer. Presumably as a result of the foregoing, for example, when the surface to be treated, such as tungsten, is subjected to chemical mechanical polishing using the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing, the surface to be treated is suppressed from being corroded by an oxidizing agent serving as an etchant more than necessary.

[0078]

By such expression mechanism, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment expresses a dramatically high corrosion-suppressing effect on the surface to be treated as compared to the case of using each of the component (A) and the component (B) alone as a corrosion-suppressing agent. As described above, it is considered that the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to the embodiment of the invention achieves the suppression of the corrosion of the surface to be treated by virtue of the coexistence of the component (A), which is a complexing agent, and the component (B), which is an anionic compound.

[0079]

The anionic surfactant to be used as the component (B) in this case is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include carboxylic acid salts, sulfonic acid salts, succinic acid salts, sulfate salts, and phosphate salts. The carboxylic acid salts are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include fatty acid soaps and alkyl ether carboxylic acid salts. The sulfonic acid salts are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include alkylbenzenesulfonic acid salts, alkylnaphthalenesulfonic acid salts, and α-olefin sulfonic acid salts. The succinic acid salts are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include alkenyl succinic acid salts. The sulfate salts are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include higher alcohol sulfate salts and alkyl sulfate salts. The phosphates are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include alkyl phosphates. Of those, potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, a dipotassium alkenylsuccinate, and octyl phosphoric acid ester are particularly preferred. The compounds described above may be used alone or in combination thereof.

1.2.2. Surfactant Having Sulfo Group

[0080]

When the component (A) is the compound represented by the general formula (2) in which R3 represents an organic group having 2 to 10 carbon atoms that contains a nitrogen atom, the component (B) is preferably a surfactant having a sulfo group. When the surfactant having a sulfo group is selected as the component (B), the anticorrosive film having a multilayer structure resulting from the interaction with the component (A) is easily formed, and for example, in the case of using the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing as a chemical mechanical polishing composition, it is possible to polish the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0081]

More specifically, the inventors speculate as follows. That is, the compound represented by the general formula (2) serving as the component (A) becomes cationic under an acidic condition sufficiently lower than an isoelectric point, and hence the component (B), which is anionic, adsorbs to the component (A) by virtue of an electrostatic interaction. Further, alkyl carbon chains substituting the component (B) self-assemble with each other on the surface to be treated through a hydrophobic interaction, to thereby increase the thickness of an adsorption layer. Presumably as a result of the foregoing, for example, when the surface to be treated, such as tungsten, is subjected to chemical mechanical polishing using the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing, the surface to be treated is suppressed from being corroded by an oxidizing agent serving as an etchant more than necessary.

[0082]

By such expression mechanism, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment expresses a dramatically high corrosion-suppressing effect on the surface to be treated as compared to the case of using each of the component (A) and the component (B) alone as a corrosion-suppressing agent. As described above, it is considered that the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to the embodiment of the invention achieves the suppression of the corrosion of the surface to be treated by virtue of the coexistence of the component (A), which is a complexing agent, and the component (B), which is a surfactant having a sulfo group.

[0083]

The surfactant having a sulfo group to be used as the component (B) is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include alkylbenzenesulfonic acid salts, alkylnaphthalenesulfonic acid salts, α-olefin sulfonic acid salts, and sulfate salts. The sulfate salts are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include higher alcohol sulfate salts and alkyl sulfate salts. Of those, an alkylbenzenesulfonic acid or a salt thereof is preferred, and dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid or a salt thereof is particularly preferred.

1.2.3. Betaine-Based Surfactant Having Carboxyl Group

[0084]

When the component (A) is the compound represented by the general formula (2) in which R3 represents an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group, or the compound represented by the general formula (3), it is preferred that at least one kind selected from the group consisting of compounds represented by the following general formulae (4), (5), and (6) be selected as the component (B). In this case, the anticorrosive film having a multilayer structure resulting from the interaction with the component (A) is easily formed, and for example, in the case of using the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing as a chemical mechanical polishing composition, it is possible to polish the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0085]

More specifically, the inventors speculate as follows. That is, first, the component (A) serving as a complexing agent forms a complex on a tungsten surface. Then, with respect to a carboxyl group of the component (A), the component (B), which also has a carboxyl group, forms a complementary hydrogen bond, and thus a two-layer film formed of the component (A) and the component (B) is formed on the surface to be treated. Further, alkyl carbon chains of the component (B) self-assemble with each other on the surface to be treated through a hydrophobic interaction, to thereby increase the thickness of an adsorption layer. Presumably as a result of the foregoing, for example, when the surface to be treated, such as tungsten, is subjected to chemical mechanical polishing using the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing, the surface to be treated is suppressed from being corroded by an oxidizing agent serving as an etchant more than necessary.

[0086]

By such expression mechanism, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment expresses a dramatically high corrosion-suppressing effect on the surface to be treated as compared to the case of using each of the component (A) and the component (B) alone as a corrosion-suppressing agent. As described above, it is considered that the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to the embodiment of the invention achieves the suppression of the corrosion of the surface to be treated by virtue of the coexistence of the component (A), which is a complexing agent, and the component (B), which is a betaine-based surfactant.

[0087]

The betaine-based surfactant having a carboxyl group to be used as the component (B) is not particularly limited, but a preferred specific example thereof is at least one kind selected from the group consisting of compounds represented by the following formula (3), formula (4), and formula (5):

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (4), R8 to R10 each independently represent any one functional group selected from the group consisting of hydrocarbon groups each having 1 to 15 carbon atoms, and R11 represents a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 5 carbon atoms;

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (5), R12 and R13 each independently represent any one functional group selected from the group consisting of a hydrogen atom, a hydrocarbon group having 5 to 20 carbon atoms, an organic group having 5 to 20 carbon atoms that has an amide group, an organic group having 5 to 20 carbon atoms that has an amino group, an organic group having 5 to 20 carbon atoms that has an imide group, an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group, and an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a hydroxyl group, and R14 represents a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 5 carbon atoms; and

[0000]

[0000]

in the general formula (6), R15 and R16 each independently represent any one functional group selected from the group consisting of a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 20 carbon atoms, and an organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a hydroxyl group, and R17 represents a hydrocarbon group having 1 to 5 carbon atoms.

[0088]

The hydrocarbon group having 1 to 15 carbon atoms in each of R8 to R10 in the general formula (4) is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof may include an alkyl group having 1 to 15 carbon atoms that may be linear or branched, and a cyclic hydrocarbon group having 3 to 15 carbon atoms. Of those, an alkyl group having 1 to 15 carbon atoms that may be linear or branched is preferred, and it is particularly preferred that at least one of R8 to R10 represent a linear alkyl group having 5 to 15 carbon atoms.

[0089]

A carboxyethyl group or a carboxymethyl group is preferred as the organic group having 1 to 10 carbon atoms that has a carboxyl group in the general formula (5).

[0090]

Of those, at least one kind selected from the group consisting of lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine, laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine, and 2-lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium betaine is particularly preferred as the component (B). In this case, the suppression of the corrosion of the surface to be treated is particularly achieved.

[0091]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated, the content of the component (B) is 0.0001 mass % or more and 1 mass % or less, preferably 0.0005 mass % or more and 0.5 mass % or less, more preferably 0.001 mass % or more and 0.1 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the chemical mechanical polishing composition. When the content of the component (B) falls within the above-mentioned range, it is possible to more effectively polish the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0092]

A ratio between the component (A) and the component (B) is preferably from 1:20 to 40:1, more preferably from 1:10 to 20:1. When the ratio between the component (A) and the component (B) falls within the above-mentioned range, it is possible to more effectively polish the surface to be treated while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate.

[0093]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a cleaning composition for cleaning the object to be treated after chemical mechanical polishing, the content of the component (B) is 0.0001 mass % or more and 1 mass % or less, preferably 0.0005 mass % or more and 0.5 mass % or less, more preferably 0.001 mass % or more and 0.05 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the cleaning composition. When the content of the component (A) falls within the above-mentioned range, it is possible to more efficiently remove the metal oxide film and the organic residue on the wiring board while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated.

[0094]

A ratio between the component (A) and the component (B) is preferably from 1:20 to 40:1, more preferably from 1:10 to 20:1. When the ratio between the component (A) and the component (B) falls within the above-mentioned range, it is possible to more efficiently remove the metal oxide film and the organic residue on the wiring board while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated.

1.3. Oxidizing Agent (C)

[0095]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing may further contain an oxidizing agent (C). It is considered that the following effect is obtained when the chemical mechanical polishing composition according to this embodiment contains the oxidizing agent (C): the surface to be treated including a wiring layer containing a metal, such as tungsten, is oxidized to promote a complexation reaction with a polishing liquid component, to thereby form a brittle modified layer on the surface to be treated, and thus polishing is facilitated.

[0096]

The oxidizing agent (C) is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include ammonium persulfate, potassium persulfate, hydrogen peroxide, ferric nitrate, diammonium cerium nitrate, iron sulfate, hypochlorous acid, ozone, potassium periodate, and peracetic acid. Those oxidizing agents (C) may be used alone or in combination thereof. In addition, of those oxidizing agents (C), ammonium persulfate or hydrogen peroxide is preferred in consideration of, for example, oxidizing power, compatibility with a protective film, and ease of handling.

[0097]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition, the content of the oxidizing agent (C) is 0.01 mass % or more and it mass % or less, preferably 0.05 mass % or more and 8 mass % or less, more preferably 0.1 mass % or more and 5 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the chemical mechanical polishing composition.

[0098]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a cleaning composition for cleaning the object to be treated after chemical mechanical polishing, the content of the oxidizing agent (C) is 0 mass % or more and 1 mass % or less, preferably 0 mass % or more and 0.05 mass % or less, more preferably 0 mass % or more and 0.01 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the cleaning composition.

1.4. pH Adjusting Agent (D)

[0099]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment contains a pH adjusting agent. The pH adjusting agent is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include acidic compounds, such as maleic acid, nitric acid, and phosphoric acid. The pH of the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is not particularly limited, but is preferably 1 or more and 6 or less, more preferably 1 or more and 5 or less. When the pH falls within the above-mentioned range, the storage stability of the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing is satisfactory. In addition, when, for example, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated, it is possible to polish the surface to be treated, where a tungsten film and an insulating film, such as a silicon oxide film, coexist, while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated without lowering the polishing rate on the surface to be treated. The content of the pH adjusting agent may be appropriately adjusted so that the above-mentioned pH may be obtained, and is preferably 0.1 mass % or more and 3 mass % or less, more preferably 0.2 mass % or more and 2 mass % or less, particularly preferably 0.3 mass % or more and 1 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing.

1.5. (E) Abrasive Grains

[0100]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated, the treatment agent for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment may further contain abrasive grains (E). The abrasive grains (E) are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include inorganic particles, such as silica particles, ceria particles, alumina particles, zirconia particles, and titania particles.

[0101]

The silica particles are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include colloidal silica and fumed silica. Of those, colloidal silica is preferred. The colloidal silica is used preferably from the viewpoint of reducing polishing defects, such as a scratch, and for example, one produced by a method disclosed in JP-A-2003-109921 may be used. In addition, colloidal silica surface-modified by a method disclosed in JP-A-2010-269985, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., Vol. 12, No. 6, (2006) 911-917, or the like may be used.

[0102]

In particular, sulfonic acid-modified colloidal silica obtained by introducing a sulfo group into the surface of colloidal silica is excellent in stability under an acidic condition, and hence is suitably used in the invention. As a method of introducing a sulfo group into the surface of colloidal silica, there is given a method involving modifying the surface of colloidal silica with a silane coupling agent having a functional group capable of being chemically converted to a sulfo group, and then converting the functional group to a sulfo group. Examples of such silane coupling agent include: silane coupling agents each having a mercapto group, such as 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane, 2-mercaptoethyltrimethoxysilane, and 2-mercaptoethyltriethoxysilane; and silane coupling agents each having a sulfide group, such as bis(3-trietboxysilylpropyl)disulfide. The mercapto group or the sulfide group of the silane coupling agent with which the surface of colloidal silica is modified can be converted to a sulfo group by being oxidized.

[0103]

The content of the abrasive grains (E) is (0.1 mass % or more and 10 mass % or less, preferably 0.1 mass % or more and 8 mass % or less, more preferably 0.1 mass % or more and 7 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing. When the content of the abrasive grains (E) falls within the above-mentioned range, a practical polishing rate of a tungsten film can be achieved.

1.6. Aqueous Medium

[0104]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment contains an aqueous medium. Water is more preferably used as the aqueous medium.

1.7. Other Additives

[0105]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment may have further added thereto additives, such as a surfactant other than the above-mentioned surfactant, a water-soluble polymer, and a corrosion inhibitor, as necessary. Each additive will be described below.

1.7.1. Surfactant

[0106]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment may have further added thereto a surfactant as necessary as long as the combination of the component (A) and the component (B) is not overlapped. The surfactant has an effect of imparting an appropriate viscous property to the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing. The viscosity of the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing is preferably adjusted so as to be 0.5 mPa's or more and 2 mPa's or less at 25° C.

[0107]

The surfactant is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include a cationic surfactant, a non-ionic surfactant, an amphoteric surfactant, and an anionic surfactant.

[0108]

The cationic surfactant is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include aliphatic amine salts and aliphatic ammonium salts.

[0109]

The non-ionic surfactant is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include an ether-type surfactant, an ether ester-type surfactant, an ester-type surfactant, and an acetylene-based surfactant. The ether ester-type surfactant is not particularly limited, but a specific example thereof is a polyoxyethylene ether of a glycerin ester. The ester-type surfactant is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include a polyethylene glycol fatty acid ester, a glycerin ester, and a sorbitan ester. The acetylene-based surfactant is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include ethylene oxide adducts of acetylene alcohol, acetylene glycol, and acetylene diol.

[0110]

The amphoteric surfactant is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include betaine-based surfactants.

[0111]

The anionic surfactant is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include carboxylic acid salts, sulfonic acid salts, sulfate salts, and phosphate salts. The carboxylic acid salts are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include fatty acid soaps and alkyl ether carboxylic acid salts. Examples of the sulfonic acid salts include alkylbenzenesulfonic acid salts, alkylnaphthalenesulfonic acid salts, and α-olefin sulfonic acid salts. The sulfate salts are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include higher alcohol sulfate salts and alkyl sulfate salts. The phosphates are not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include alkyl phosphates.

[0112]

Those surfactants may be used alone or in combination thereof.

[0113]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated, the content of the surfactant is 0.001 mass % or more and 1 mass % or less, preferably 0.002 mass % or more and 0.8 mass % or less, more preferably 0.003 mass % or more and 0.5 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the chemical mechanical polishing composition. When the addition amount of the surfactant falls within the above-mentioned range, a smooth polished surface can be more effectively obtained after the removal of the silicon oxide film by polishing.

[0114]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a cleaning composition for cleaning the object to be treated after chemical mechanical polishing, the content of the surfactant is 0.001 mass % or more and 1 mass % or less, preferably 0.002 mass % or more and 0.8 mass % or less, more preferably 0.003 mass % or more and 0.5 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the cleaning composition. When the addition amount of the surfactant falls within the above-mentioned range, it is possible to efficiently remove the organic residue while reducing the corrosion of the surface to be treated after the removal of the silicon oxide film by polishing.

1.7.2. Water-Soluble Polymer

[0115]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment may have further added thereto a water-soluble polymer as necessary. It is considered that the water-soluble polymer has a function of adsorbing onto the surface of the surface to be polished to reduce polishing friction. Thus, when the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated, the addition of the water-soluble polymer can suppress the occurrence of dishing or corrosion in some cases.

[0116]

The water-soluble polymer is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include polyacrylamide, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and hydroxyethyl cellulose, provided that polyacrylic acid is excluded.

[0117]

The addition amount of the water-soluble polymer may be adjusted so that the viscosity of the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing may be 2 mPa's or less. When the viscosity of the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing is 2 mPa's or less, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing can be stably supplied onto an abrasive cloth more effectively. As a result, an increase in temperature of the abrasive cloth, polishing non-uniformity (deterioration in in-plane uniformity), and the like may be less liable to occur, and variations in polishing rate and dishing may be less liable to occur.

1.7.3. Corrosion Inhibitor

[0118]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment may have further added thereto a corrosion inhibitor as necessary. The corrosion inhibitor is not particularly limited, but specific examples thereof include benzotriazole and a derivative thereof. Herein, the benzotriazole derivative refers to a product obtained by substitution of one or two or more hydrogen atoms in benzotriazole with, for example, a carboxyl group, a methyl group, an amino group, or a hydroxyl group. Examples of the benzotriazole derivative include 4-carboxylbenzotriazole and salts thereof, 7-carboxybenzotriazole and salts thereof, benzotriazole butyl esters, 1-hydroxymethylbenzotriazole, and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole.

[0119]

When the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated, and the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is used as a cleaning composition for cleaning the object to be treated after chemical mechanical polishing, the addition amount of the corrosion inhibitor is 0.001 mass % or more and 1 mass % or less, preferably 0.002 mass % or more and 0.8 mass % or less, more preferably 0.003 mass % or more and 0.5 mass % or less with respect to the total mass of the composition.

1.8. Electrode Charge Transfer Resistance Value

[0120]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is such that in an electrode charge transfer resistance value obtained by AC impedance measurement using the metal for an electrode, a value (RA+RB) obtained by summing up an electrode charge transfer resistance value (RA) in an aqueous solution containing the component (A) and the pH adjusting agent (D), and an electrode charge transfer resistance value (RB) in an aqueous solution containing the component (B) and the pH adjusting agent (D), and an electrode charge transfer resistance value (RC) in an aqueous solution containing the component (A), the component (B), and the pH adjusting agent (D) have a relationship of RC/(RA+RB)>1. The charge transfer resistance value is a resistance component derived from corrosion of the metal at an interface between the metal and a solution among resistance components appearing when an AC impedance measurement apparatus, the metal, and the solution are electrically conducted to form a circuit. In addition, the charge transfer resistance value corresponds to the reciprocal value of the corrosion rate of the metal. That is, a large charge transfer resistance value is an indicator of a low corrosion rate of the metal. When the anticorrosive film to be formed on the metal surface is increased in thickness, a cause of corrosion, i.e., erosion by an oxidizing agent, an etching component, or the like is inhibited, and hence the charge transfer resistance value increases. In view of this, obtaining a large charge transfer resistance value is generally recognized as an effort to form a thick anticorrosive film on the metal surface.

[0121]

The case in which the electrode charge transfer resistance values satisfy the relationship of RC/(RA+RB)>1 means that the electrode charge transfer resistance value (RC) of a treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing containing both the component (A) and the component (B) is a higher resistance value than the sum (RA+RB) of the electrode charge transfer resistance values (RA, RB) of treatment compositions for chemical mechanical polishing containing the component (A) or the component (B) alone. That is, as described above, in such a treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing that the component (A) and the component (B) form an anticorrosive film having a multilayer structure through the interaction between the two compounds instead of each individually having a corrosion suppression action, the electrode charge transfer resistance value (RC) that is higher than the sum (RA+RB) of the electrode charge transfer resistance values (RA, RB) of the treatment compositions for chemical mechanical polishing containing the component (A) or the component (B) alone is obtained, and corrosion can be dramatically suppressed as compared to the case of using the component (A) or the component (B) alone for a metal corrosion-suppressing agent.

[0122]

The electrode charge transfer resistance value obtained by the AC impedance measurement using the metal for an electrode is a value (l/cm) obtained by: bonding an insulating tape to a central 1 cm×1 cm portion of a metal wafer cut to 1 cm×3 cm, attaching an electrode clip to an upper 1 cm 1 cm exposed area of the metal wafer; connecting the metal wafer to a measurement apparatus with a controlled AC voltage; immersing a lower 1 cm×1 cm exposed area of the metal wafer in an aqueous solution for 5 minutes; applying an AC voltage having an amplitude of S mV and a frequency of from 1,500 Hz to 0.5 Hz changing from a higher frequency to a lower frequency to obtain values for the real part and the imaginary part of a resistance value; plotting the imaginary part on a vertical axis and the real part on a horizontal axis; and analyzing the resultant semicircular plot with AC impedance analysis software. As an apparatus for measuring an electrode charge transfer resistance, there is used, for example, a potentio/galvanostat (manufactured by Solartron Analytical, SI 1287) with a frequency response analyzer (manufactured by Solartron Analytical, Model 1252A FRA) connected thereto. More specifically, an insulating tape is bonded to a central 1 cm×1 cm portion of a tungsten cut wafer cut to 1 cm×3 cm, an electrode clip is attached to an upper 1 cm×1 cm exposed area of the wafer, the wafer is connected to a measurement apparatus with a controlled AC voltage, and a lower 1 cm×1 cm exposed area of the wafer is immersed in the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing serving as a measurement object. After a lapse of 5 minutes of immersion, an AC voltage having an amplitude of 5 mV and a frequency of from 1,500 Hz to 0.5 Hz changing from a higher frequency to a lower frequency is applied to obtain values for the real part and the imaginary part of a resistance value, the imaginary part and the real part are plotted on a vertical axis and a horizontal axis, respectively, and the resultant semicircular plot is analyzed with AC impedance analysis software “ZView” manufactured by Solartron Analytical. Thus, the electrode charge transfer resistance value (l/cm2) can be calculated.

[0123]

The electrode charge transfer resistance value (RC) of the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing containing both the component (A) and the component (B) is preferably more than 100 kW/cm2. In this case, the corrosion-suppressing effect on the surface to be treated containing tungsten or the like is increased. When the electrode charge transfer resistance value (RC) is 100 kΩ/cm2 or less, the oxidation rate of the surface to be treated is high, and hence the corrosion-suppressing effect on the surface to be treated is hardly obtained.

1.9. Applications

[0124]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment can be suitably used as a chemical mechanical polishing composition in polishing of a wiring board serving as the object to be treated in CMP. As described above, when both the component (A) and the component (B) are used, the corrosion-suppressing effect on the surface to be treated is dramatically increased. Therefore, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is suitable as a polishing agent for polishing, in a semiconductor device manufacturing process, an object to be treated, such as a semiconductor wafer, including a wiring layer containing a metal, such as tungsten, in particular, the surface to be treated of the object to be treated, where a tungsten film and an insulating film, such as a silicon oxide film, coexist, while reducing the corrosion of the surface of the tungsten film without lowering the polishing rate.

[0125]

In addition, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment can be suitably used as a cleaning composition in cleaning of a wiring board after the completion of CMP. As described above, when both the component (A) and the component (B) are used, the corrosion-suppressing effect on the surface to be treated is dramatically increased. Therefore, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment is suitable as a cleaning agent for efficiently removing an oxide film and an organic residue on a wiring board while reducing the corrosion of a tungsten film surface that is the surface to be treated after chemical mechanical polishing.

1.10. Method of Preparing Treatment Composition for Chemical Mechanical Polishing

[0126]

The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment may be prepared by dissolving or dispersing the above-mentioned components in an aqueous medium, such as water. A method of dissolving or dispersing the components is not particularly limited, and any method may be applied as long as the components can be uniformly dissolved or dispersed. Besides, the mixing order of the above-mentioned components and a method of mixing the components are also not particularly limited.

[0127]

In addition, at the time of use, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to this embodiment may be used after having been diluted with a dispersion medium, such as water.

2. TREATMENT METHOD

[0128]

A treatment method according to an embodiment of the invention includes subjecting an object to be treated including a wiring layer containing a metal, such as tungsten, which is a component of a semiconductor device, to chemical mechanical polishing or cleaning treatment through use of the above-mentioned treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to the invention. A chemical mechanical polishing method and cleaning method according to this embodiment are not particularly limited, but one specific example is described in detail below with reference to the drawings.

2.1. Object to be Treated

[0129]

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view for schematically illustrating an object to be treated suitable for use in the chemical mechanical polishing method according to this embodiment. An object 100 to be treated is formed through the following steps (1) to (4).

[0130]

(1) First, a silicon substrate 10 is prepared. The silicon substrate 10 may have formed thereon a functional device, such as a transistor (not shown).

[0131]

(2) A silicon oxide film 12 is formed by using a CVD method or a thermal oxidation method on the silicon substrate 10.

[0132]

(3) The silicon oxide film 12 is patterned. With the use of the pattern as a mask, a wiring depression 20 is formed in the silicon oxide film 12 by applying, for example, an etching method.

[0133]

(4) A tungsten film 14 is deposited by a sputtering method so as to fill the wiring depression 20, the object 100 to be treated is obtained.

2.2. Polishing Step

[0134]

Through use of, for example, the above-mentioned chemical mechanical polishing composition among the above-mentioned treatment compositions for chemical mechanical polishing, the tungsten film 14 deposited on the silicon oxide film 12 of the object 100 to be treated is removed by polishing, and then a tungsten plug, a barrier metal film made of titanium or the like, and an insulating film are polished. According to the chemical mechanical polishing method according to this embodiment, through use of the above-mentioned treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing as a chemical mechanical polishing composition, it is possible to polish the surface to be treated, where the tungsten film and the insulating film, such as the silicon oxide film, coexist, while reducing the corrosion of the surface of the tungsten film without lowering the polishing rate.

[0135]

For the above-mentioned polishing step, for example, a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus 200 as illustrated in FIG. 2 may be used. FIG. 2 is a perspective view for schematically illustrating the chemical mechanical polishing apparatus 200.

[0136]

The above-mentioned polishing step is performed by supplying a slurry (chemical mechanical polishing composition) 44 from a slurry supply nozzle 42, and while rotating a turntable 48 having attached thereto an abrasive cloth 46, bringing a carrier head 52 holding a semiconductor substrate 50 into abutment against the abrasive cloth 46. In FIG. 2, a water supply nozzle 54 and a dresser 56 are also illustrated.

[0137]

The pressing pressure of the carrier head 52 may be selected within the range of from 10 hPa to 1,000 hPa, and is preferably from 30 hPa to 500 hPa. In addition, the rotation speed of each of the turntable 48 and the carrier head 52 may be appropriately selected within the range of from 10 rpm to 400 rpm, and is preferably from 30 rpm to 150 rpm. The flow rate of the slurry (chemical mechanical polishing composition) 44 to be supplied from the slurry supply nozzle 42 may be selected within the range of from 10 mL/min to 1,000 mL/min, and is preferably from 50 mL/min to 400 mL/min.

[0138]

Examples of the commercially available polishing apparatus include models “EPO-112” and “EPO-222” manufactured by Ebara Corporation, models “LGP-510” and “LGP-552” manufactured by Lapmaster SFT Corporation, and models “Mirra” and “Reflexion” manufactured by Applied Materials Inc.

2.3. Cleaning Step

[0139]

Subsequently, the resultant surface to be treated is cleaned using the above-mentioned cleaning composition. According to the cleaning method according to this embodiment, on the surface to be treated after the completion of CMP, where a wiring material and the tungsten film coexist with the insulating film, such as the silicon oxide film, the corrosion of the wiring material and the tungsten film can be suppressed, and at the same time, an oxide film and an organic residue on the wiring board can be efficiently removed.

[0140]

A cleaning method is not particularly limited, but the cleaning step is performed by a method involving bringing the above-mentioned cleaning composition into direct contact with the surface to be treated. Examples of the method of bringing the cleaning composition into direct contact with the surface to be treated include: a dipping method involving filling a cleaning bath with the cleaning composition and dipping the wiring board thereinto; a spin method involving rotating the wiring board at high speed while causing the cleaning composition to flow down to the wiring board from a nozzle; and a spray method involving spraying the cleaning composition to the wiring board to clean the wiring board. In addition, as a device for performing such method, for example, there are given: a batch cleaning device to simultaneously clean a plurality of wiring boards accommodated in a cassette; and a single-wafer cleaning device to clean one wiring board attached to a holder. In addition, there is also given a platen cleaning system involving spreading, after CMP treatment, the cleaning composition onto another platen of the polishing apparatus, and subjecting the semiconductor substrate to cleaning treatment on the platen.

[0141]

In the cleaning method according to this embodiment, the temperature of the cleaning composition is generally set to room temperature. However, the cleaning composition may be warmed within a range not impairing its performance. For example, the cleaning composition may be warmed to from about 40° C. to about 70° C.

[0142]

Further, cleaning with ultrapure water or pure water may be performed before and/or after cleaning by the cleaning method according to this embodiment.

3. EXAMPLES

[0143]

The invention is described by way of Examples, but the invention is by no means limited to these Examples. The terms “part(s)” and “%” in Examples and Comparative Examples are by mass, unless otherwise stated.

3.1. Chemical Mechanical Polishing Composition Containing Anionic Surfactant or Polyacrylic Acid as (B)

3.1.1. Preparation of Chemical Mechanical Polishing Composition

Comparative Example 101

[0144]

A colloidal silica aqueous dispersion PL-3 (manufactured by Fuso Chemical Co., Ltd.) was loaded in an amount corresponding to 1 mass % in terms of silica into a container made of polyethylene, and ion-exchanged water and maleic acid serving as a pH adjusting agent were added so as to achieve a total amount of constituent components of 100 mass % and adjust pH to 3. Further, 35 mass %/a aqueous hydrogen peroxide was added as an oxidizing agent at 1 mass % in terms of hydrogen peroxide, and the mixture was stirred for 15 minutes to provide a chemical mechanical polishing composition of Comparative Example 101.

Comparative Examples 102 to 119

[0145]

On the basis of Comparative Example 101, in accordance with compositions shown in Table 1, chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing only the component (A) were defined as Comparative Examples 102 to 109, and chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing only the component (B) were defined as Comparative Examples 110 to 119.

Examples 101 to 118

[0146]

On the basis of Comparative Example 101, chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing the component (A) and the component (B) shown in Table 2 were prepared and defined as Examples 101 to 118.

Comparative Examples 120 to 125

[0147]

On the basis of Comparative Example 101, chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing the component (A) and the component (B) shown in Table 2 were prepared and defined as Comparative Examples 120 to 125.

Examples 119 to 132

[0148]

Next, on the basis of Example 108, various chemical mechanical polishing compositions were prepared by changing the addition amounts of the component (A) and the component (B), the amount of hydrogen peroxide serving as the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value. That is, various chemical mechanical polishing compositions were prepared by using N-(2-aminoethyl) piperazine as the component (A) and octyl phosphoric acid ester as the component (B), and changing the addition amounts of the component (A) and the component (B), the amount of hydrogen peroxide serving as the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value in accordance with compositions shown in Table 3, and were defined as Examples 119 to 132.

Comparative Examples 126 to 153

[0149]

In accordance with compositions shown in Table 3, chemical mechanical polishing compositions using no component (B) in Examples 119 to 132 were obtained as Comparative Examples 126 to 139, and chemical mechanical polishing compositions using no component (A) in Examples 119 to 132 were obtained as Comparative Examples 140 to 153.

3.1.2. Evaluation Methods

3.1.2.1. Evaluation of Charge Transfer Resistance

[0150]

A potentio/galvanostat (manufactured by Solartron Analytical, SI 1287) with a frequency response analyzer (manufactured by Solartron Analytical, Model 1252A FRA) connected thereto was used as a measurement apparatus, and an AC voltage having an amplitude of 5 mV and a frequency of from 1,500 Hz to 0.5 Hz changing from a higher frequency to a lower frequency was applied to a metal wafer having one end immersed in an aqueous solution to obtain a resistance value. More specifically, an insulating tape was bonded to a central 1 cm×1 cm portion of a tungsten cut wafer cut to 1 cm×3 cm, an electrode clip was attached to an upper 1 cm×1 cm exposed area of the wafer, the wafer was connected to a measurement apparatus with a controlled AC voltage, and a lower 1 cm×1 cm exposed area of the wafer was immersed in each obtained treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing at 25° C. After a lapse of 5 minutes of immersion, an AC voltage having an amplitude of 5 mV and a frequency of from 1,500 Hz to 0.5 Hz changing from a higher frequency to a lower frequency was applied to obtain values for the real part and the imaginary part of a resistance value. A semicircular plot obtained by plotting the imaginary part on a vertical axis and the real part on a horizontal axis was analyzed with AC impedance analysis software “ZView” manufactured by Solartron Analytical, and a charge transfer resistance (Ω/cm2) was calculated. The reciprocal of the resultant charge transfer resistance is a value proportional to the corrosion rate of tungsten.

3.1.2.2. Evaluation of Corrosion Observation

[0151]

Each obtained chemical mechanical polishing composition was kept at 25° C. A tungsten cut wafer (1 cm×1 cm) was immersed therein for 1 hour, cleaned with running water for 10 seconds, and dried. After that, corrosion of the surface of the wafer was observed with a scanning electron microscope at a magnification of 50,000.

[0152]

Evaluation criteria for the corrosion are as described below.

[0153]

Very Good: A case in which no change in shape of the surface due to corrosion is found as compared to that before the immersion is determined as a particularly satisfactory result.

[0154]

Good: A case in which a site corroded as compared to that before the immersion and a non-corroded site are mixed is determined as a satisfactory result.

[0155]

Bad: A case in which the entire surface is corroded as compared to that before the immersion is determined as a poor result.

3.1.2.3. Evaluation of Polishing Rate

[0156]

For a tungsten wafer test piece cut to 3 cm×3 cm serving as an object to be polished, a film thickness was measured in advance using a metal film thickness meter “RG-5” manufactured by NPS, Inc. Model “LM-15C” manufactured by Lapmaster SFT Corporation was used as a polishing apparatus, and “IC1000/K-Groove” manufactured by Rodel Nitta Company was used as a polishing pad. The tungsten wafer test piece was subjected to chemical mechanical polishing treatment for 1 minute under the polishing conditions of a platen rotation speed of 90 rpm, a head rotation speed of 90 rpm, a head pressing pressure of 3 psi, and a chemical mechanical polishing composition supply rate of 100 mL/min. For the test piece after the polishing, a film thickness was similarly measured, and a difference between the film thicknesses before and after the polishing, i.e., a decrease in film thickness due to the chemical mechanical polishing treatment was calculated. A polishing rate was calculated from the decrease in film thickness and the polishing time.

3.1.3. Evaluation Results

[0157]

The compositions of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions obtained in Comparative Examples 101 to 119, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 1 below. The compositions of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions obtained in Examples 101 to 118 and Comparative Examples 120 to 125, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 2 below. The compositions of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions obtained in Examples 119 to 132 and Comparative Examples 126 to 153, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 3 below.

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAdditionAddition
amountamountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)Abrasive grains(mass %)
Comparative101Colloidal silica1
Example102Piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
103Piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
104N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
105N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
106N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.1Colloidal silica1
107N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
108N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
109N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.1Colloidal silica1
110Dipotassium alkenylsuccinate0.01Colloidal silica1
111Dipotassium alkenylsuccinate0.05Colloidal silica1
112Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid0.001Colloidal silica1
betaine
113Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
114Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
115Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
116Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
1172,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-0.01Colloidal silica1
4,7-oligoethylene glycol
118Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER0.01Colloidal silica1
AC-10L)
119Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER0.05Colloidal silica1
AC-10H)
Compositions
AdditionEvaluation result
amountpH adjustingCharge transferCorrosionPolishing
Oxidizing agent(mass %)agentpHresistance (kΩ/cm2)observation resultrate (Å/min)
Comparative101Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad371
Example102Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad333
103Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad340
104Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid36Bad342
105Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid313Bad285
106Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid351Good298
107Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid320Bad295
108Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid347Good216
109Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid388Good197
110Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad329
111Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad380
112Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid323Good284
113Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad303
114Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad389
115Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad323
116Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad324
117Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad311
118Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad312
119Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad376

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAdditionAddition
amountamountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)Abrasive grains(mass %)
Example101Piperazine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
102Piperazine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
103N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Dipotassium alkenylsuccinate0.05Colloidal silica1
104N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Dipotassium alkenylsuccinate0.01Colloidal silica1
105N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
106N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
107N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
108N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
109N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01Colloidal silica1
110N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.1Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10H)0.05Colloidal silica1
111N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.005Dipotassium alkenylsuccinate0.05Colloidal silica1
112N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Dipotassium alkenylsuccinate0.01Colloidal silica1
113N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
114N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
115N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.005Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
116N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
117N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01Colloidal silica1
118N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.1Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10H)0.05Colloidal silica1
Comparative120Piperazine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.001Colloidal silica1
Example121Piperazine0.012,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-0.01Colloidal silica1
4,7-oligoethylene glycol
122N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.001Colloidal silica1
123N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.012,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-0.01Colloidal silica1
4,7-oligoethylene glycol
124N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.001Colloidal silica1
125N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.012,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-0.01Colloidal silica1
4,7-oligoethylene glycol
CompositionsEvaluation result
AdditionCharge transferPolishing
amountpH adjustingresistanceCorrosionrateRC/(RA +
Oxidizing agent(mass %)agentpH(kΩ/cm2)observation result(Å/min)RB) value
Example101Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3100Very Good30550
102Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3120Very Good29860
103Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3325Very Good32146
104Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3340Very Good18624
105Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3230Very Good28633
106Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3285Very Good19620
107Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3385Very Good27755
108Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3480Very Good23134
109Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3100Very Good2057
110Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3405Very Good1808
111Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3105Very Good2405
112Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3115Very Good2872
113Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3340Very Good21116
114Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3420Very Good2809
115Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3280Very Good25713
116Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3325Very Good1997
117Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3180Very Good2424
118Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3310Very Good2123
Comparative120Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid37Bad2730.3
Example121Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad3010.5
122Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid320Bad2860.6
123Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid34Bad2890.3
124Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid323Bad3010.3
125Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid36Bad2220.1

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAdditionAddition
amountamountAbrasiveamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)grains(mass %)
Comparative126N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
Example127N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
128N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
129N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
130N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
131N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
132N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Colloidal silica1
133N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
134N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
135N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
136N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
137N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
138N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
139N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Colloidal silica1
140Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
141Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
142Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
143Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
144Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
145Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
146Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
147Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
148Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
149Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
150Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
151Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
152Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
153Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
Example119N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
120N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
121N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
122N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
123N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
124N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
125N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.005Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.05Colloidal silica1
126N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
127N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
128N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
129N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
130N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
131N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
132N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
Compositions
AdditionEvaluation result
amountpH adjustingCharge transferCorrosionPolishingRC/(RA + RB)
Oxidizing agent(mass %)agentpHresistance (kΩ/cm2)observation resultrate (Å/min)value
Comparative126Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid32Bad394
Example127Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid31Bad411
128Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid14Bad275
129Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid27Bad294
130Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid47Bad380
131Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid37Bad329
132Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid36Bad316
133Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid36Bad355
134Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid34Bad365
135Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid18Bad220
136Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid212Bad285
137Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid413Bad343
138Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid313Bad330
139Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid312Bad319
140Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid31Bad354
141Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid31Bad358
142Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid11Bad65
143Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid21Bad125
144Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid41Bad330
145Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid31Bad324
146Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid31Bad321
147Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid31Bad358
148Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid31Bad360
149Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid11Bad145
150Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid21Bad220
151Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid41Bad319
152Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid31Bad352
153Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid31Bad344
Example119Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid3230Very Good32177
120Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid3135Very Good34868
121Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid1255Very Good7851
122Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid2310Very Good11539
123Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid4320Very Good30040
124Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid3320Very Good31840
125Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid3335Very Good32248
126Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid3350Very Good38050
127Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid3240Very Good35548
128Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid1320Very Good13836
129Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid2400Very Good21231
130Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid4400Very Good30229
131Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid3400Very Good35129
132Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid3400Very Good33435

[0158]

Additional information is given on the following components in Tables 1 and 2, and Tables 4, 5, and 10 to 12 below.

[0159]

Polyacrylic acid (manufactured by Toagosei Co., Ltd., product name: “JURYMER AC-10L”, Mw=55,000)

[0160]

Polyacrylic acid (manufactured by Toagosei Co., Ltd., product name: “JURYMER AC-IOH”, Mw=700,000)

[0161]

As apparent from Comparative Examples 102 to 119 and 126 to 153, none of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions each prepared using the component (A) or the component (B) alone achieved satisfactory corrosion suppression. In addition, also in each of Comparative Examples 120 to 125, satisfactory corrosion suppression was not achieved. This is presumably because the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is 1 or less, and hence a synergy effect does not act between the component (A) and the component (B).

[0162]

In contrast, as apparent from Table 2, in each of Examples 101 to 118, satisfactory corrosion suppression was achieved. This is presumably because in each of Examples 101 to 118, the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is more than 1, and a synergy effect acts between the component (A) and the component (B).

[0163]

In addition, as apparent from Table 3, in each of Examples 119 to 132, satisfactory corrosion suppression was achieved. This is presumably because when the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is more than 1, a synergy effect acts between the component (A) and the component (B) irrespective of the addition amounts of additives, the addition amount of the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value. Thus, it has been demonstrated that when the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is more than 1, a satisfactory tungsten corrosion suppression ability is expressed irrespective of the addition amounts of additives, the addition amount of the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value.

3.2. Chemical Mechanical Polishing Composition Containing Surfactant Having Sulfo Group as (B)

3.2.1. Preparation of Chemical Mechanical Polishing Composition

Comparative Example 201

[0164]

A colloidal silica aqueous dispersion PL-3 (manufactured by Fuso Chemical Co., Ltd.) was loaded in an amount corresponding to 1 mass % in terms of silica into a container made of polyethylene, and ion-exchanged water and maleic acid serving as a pH adjusting agent were added so as to achieve a total amount of constituent components of 100 mass % and adjust pH to 3. Further, 35 mass % aqueous hydrogen peroxide was added as an oxidizing agent at 1 mass % in terms of hydrogen peroxide, and the mixture was stirred for 15 minutes to provide a chemical mechanical polishing composition of Comparative Example 201.

Comparative Examples 202 to 214

[0165]

On the basis of Comparative Example 201, in accordance with compositions shown in Table 4, chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing only the component (A) were defined as Comparative Examples 202 to 208, and chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing only the component (B) were defined as Comparative Examples 209 to 214.

Examples 201 to 212

[0166]

On the basis of Comparative Example 201, chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing the component (A) and the component (B) shown in Table 5 were prepared and defined as Examples 201 to 212.

Comparative Examples 215 to 221

[0167]

On the basis of Comparative Example 201, chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing the component (A) and the component (B) shown in Table 5 were prepared and defined as Comparative Examples 215 to 221.

Examples 213 to 226

[0168]

Next, on the basis of Example 201, various chemical mechanical polishing compositions were prepared by changing the addition amounts of the component (A) and the component (B), the amount of hydrogen peroxide serving as the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value. That is, various chemical mechanical polishing compositions were prepared by using histidine as the component (A) and potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate as the component (B), and changing the addition amounts of the component (A) and the component (B), the amount of hydrogen peroxide serving as the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value in accordance with compositions shown in Table 6, and were defined as Examples 213 to 226.

Comparative Examples 222 to 249

[0169]

In accordance with compositions shown in Table 6, chemical mechanical polishing compositions using no component (B) in Examples 213 to 226 were obtained as Comparative Examples 222 to 235, and chemical mechanical polishing compositions using no component (A) in Examples 213 to 226 were obtained as Comparative Examples 236 to 249.

3.2.2. Evaluation Methods

[0170]

Evaluations were performed in the same manner as in the section “3.1.2. Evaluation Methods” above.

3.2.3. Evaluation Results

[0171]

The compositions of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions obtained in Comparative Examples 201 to 214, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 4 below.

[0172]

The compositions of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions obtained in Examples 201 to 212 and Comparative Examples 215 to 221, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 5 below. The compositions of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions obtained in Examples 213 to 226 and Comparative Examples 222 to 249, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 6 below.

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAdditionAddition
amountamountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)Abrasive grains(mass %)
Comparative201Colloidal silica1
Example202Histidine0.005Colloidal silica1
203Histidine0.01Colloidal silica1
204Histidine0.05Colloidal silica1
205Arginine0.005Colloidal silica1
206Arginine0.01Colloidal silica1
207Arginine0.05Colloidal silica1
208Aspartic acid0.01Colloidal silica1
209Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
210Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
211Dodecanesulfonic acid0.01Colloidal silica1
212Dodecanesulfonic acid0.05Colloidal silica1
213Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
214Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01Colloidal silica1
Evaluation result
CompositionsCharge
AdditiontransferCorrosion
amountpH adjustingresistanceobservationPolishingRC/(RA +
Oxidizing agent(mass %)agentpH(kΩ/cm2)resultrate (Å/min)RB) value
Comparative201Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad371
Example202Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid324Good320
203Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid356Good354
204Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid393Good318
205Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid329Good317
206Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid356Good275
207Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid398Good335
208Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad305
209Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad303
210Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad348
211Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad303
212Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad351
213Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad349
214Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad383

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAdditionAddition
amountamountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)Abrasive grains(mass %)
Example201Histidine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
202Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
203Histidine0.05Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
204Arginine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
205Histidine0.005Dodecanesulfonic acid0.05Colloidal silica1
206Histidine0.01Dodecanesulfonic acid0.01Colloidal silica1
207Histidine0.05Dodecanesulfonic acid0.05Colloidal silica1
208Arginine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
209Arginine0.005Dodecanesulfonic acid0.05Colloidal silica1
210Arginine0.01Dodecanesulfonic acid0.01Colloidal silica1
211Arginine0.05Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
212Arginine0.05Dodecanesulfonic acid0.05Colloidal silica1
Comparative215Histidine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
Example216Histidine0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01Colloidal silica1
217Arginine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
218Arginine0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01Colloidal silica1
219Aspartic acid0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
220Aspartic acid0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
221Aspartic acid0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01Colloidal silica1
Evaluation result
CompositionsCharge
AdditiontransferCorrosion
amountpH adjustingresistanceobservationPolishingRC/(RA +
Oxidizing agent(mass %)agentpH(kΩ/cm2)resultrate (Å/min)RB) value
Example201Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3390Very Good35816
202Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3240Very Good3424
203Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3680Very Good3447
204Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3225Very Good2864
205Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3295Very Good34912
206Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3235Very Good3324
207Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3725Very Good3298
208Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3380Very Good31813
209Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3285Very Good31710
210Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3232Very Good3524
211Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3700Very Good2987
212Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3565Very Good2956
Comparative215Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid350Good3910.9
Example216Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid351Good3280.9
217Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid346Good3180.8
218Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid352Good3220.9
219Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad3090.5
220Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad3540.5
221Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad3480.5

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAdditionAddition
amountamountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)Abrasive grains(mass %)
Comparative222Histidine0.005Colloidal silica1
Example223Histidine0.005Colloidal silica1
224Histidine0.005Colloidal silica1
225Histidine0.005Colloidal silica1
226Histidine0.005Colloidal silica1
227Histidine0.005Colloidal silica1
228Histidine0.005Colloidal silica1
229Histidine0.01Colloidal silica1
230Histidine0.01Colloidal silica1
231Histidine0.01Colloidal silica1
235Histidine0.01Colloidal silica1
233Histidine0.01Colloidal silica1
234Histidine0.01Colloidal silica1
235Histidine0.01Colloidal silica1
236Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.005Colloidal silica1
237Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.005Colloidal silica1
238Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.005Colloidal silica1
239Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.005Colloidal silica1
240Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.005Colloidal silica1
241Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.005Colloidal silica1
242Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.005Colloidal silica1
243Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
244Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
245Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
246Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
247Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
248Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
249Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
Example213Histidine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
214Histidine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
215Histidine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
216Histidine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
217Histidine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
218Histidine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
219Histidine0.005Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.05Colloidal silica1
220Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
221Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
222Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
223Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
224Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
225Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
226Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
Evaluation result
CompositionsCharge
AdditiontransferCorrosion
amountpH adjustingresistanceobservationPolishingRC/(RA +
Oxidizing agent(mass %)agentpH(kΩ/cm2)resultrate (Å/min)RB) value
Comparative222Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid320Bad398
Example223Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid315Bad402
224Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid114Bad280
225Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid230Bad302
226Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid435Bad350
227Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid341Bad339
228Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid342Bad330
229Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid332Bad405
230Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid320Bad420
231Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid120Bad240
235Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid249Bad298
233Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid455Bad349
234Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid356Bad321
235Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid352Bad332
236Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid31Bad421
237Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid31Bad444
238Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid11Bad180
239Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid21Bad298
240Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid41Bad285
241Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid31Bad329
242Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid31Bad335
243Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid31Bad420
244Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid31Bad471
245Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid11Bad182
246Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid21Bad274
247Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid41Bad295
248Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid31Bad313
249Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid31Bad352
Example213Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid3110Very Good3285
214Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid3105Very Good3687
215Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid1140Very Good2309
216Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid2185Very Good2906
217Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid4180Very Good4025
218Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid3180Very Good3954
219Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid3190Very Good3414
220Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid3160Very Good3945
221Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid3120Very Good4246
222Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid1180Very Good1959
223Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid2220Very Good2544
224Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid4240Very Good3924
225Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid3235Very Good3764
226Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid3250Very Good3545

[0173]

As apparent from Comparative Examples 202 to 214 and 222 to 249, none of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions each prepared using the component (A) or the component (B) alone achieved satisfactory corrosion suppression. This is presumably because the charge transfer resistance value is 100 kΩ/cm2 or less, and hence the oxidation rate is high. In addition, also in each of Comparative Examples 215 to 221, satisfactory corrosion suppression was not achieved. This is presumably because the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is 1 or less, and hence a synergy effect does not act between the component (A) and the component (B).

[0174]

In contrast, in each of Examples 211 and 212, satisfactory corrosion suppression was achieved. This is presumably because in each of Examples 211 and 212, the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is more than 1, and a synergy effect acts between the component (A) and the component (B), and hence the charge transfer resistance value becomes more than 100 kΩ/cm2.

[0175]

In addition, as apparent from Table 6, in each of Examples 213 to 226, satisfactory corrosion suppression was achieved. This is presumably because, irrespective of the addition amounts of additives, the addition amount of the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value, the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is more than 1, and a synergy effect acts between the component (A) and the component (B), and hence the charge transfer resistance value becomes more than 100 kΩ/cm2. Thus, it has been demonstrated that when the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is more than 1, a satisfactory tungsten corrosion suppression ability is expressed irrespective of the addition amounts of the additives, the addition amount of the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value.

3.3. Chemical Mechanical Polishing Composition Containing Betaine-Based Surfactant Having Carboxyl Group as (B)

3.3.1. Preparation of Chemical Mechanical Polishing Composition

Comparative Example 301

[0176]

A colloidal silica aqueous dispersion PL-3 (manufactured by Fuso Chemical Co., Ltd.) was loaded in an amount corresponding to 1 mass % in terms of silica into a container made of polyethylene, and ion-exchanged water and maleic acid serving as a pH adjusting agent were added so as to achieve a total amount of constituent components of 100 mass % and adjust pH to 3. Further, 35 mass % aqueous hydrogen peroxide was added as an oxidizing agent at 1 mass %/a in terms of hydrogen peroxide, and the mixture was stirred for 15 minutes to provide a chemical mechanical polishing composition of Comparative Example 301.

Comparative Examples 302 to 322

[0177]

On the basis of Comparative Example 301, in accordance with compositions shown in Table 7, chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing only the component (A) were defined as Comparative Examples 302 to 311, and chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing only the component (B) were defined as Comparative Examples 312 to 322.

Examples 301 to 324

[0178]

On the basis of Comparative Example 301, chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing the component (A) and the component (B) shown in Table 8 were prepared and defined as Examples 301 to 324.

Comparative Examples 323 to 334

[0179]

On the basis of Comparative Example 301, chemical mechanical polishing compositions each containing the component (A) and the component (B) shown in Table 8 were prepared and defined as Comparative Examples 323 to 324.

Examples 325 to 338

[0180]

Next, on the basis of Example 305, various chemical mechanical polishing compositions were prepared by changing the addition amounts of the component (A) and the component (B), the amount of hydrogen peroxide serving as the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value. That is, various chemical mechanical polishing compositions were prepared by using arginine as the component (A) and lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine as the component (B), and changing the addition amounts of the component (A) and the component (B), the amount of hydrogen peroxide serving as the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value in accordance with compositions shown in Table 9, and were defined as Examples 325 to 338.

Comparative Examples 335 to 362

[0181]

In accordance with compositions shown in Table 9, chemical mechanical polishing compositions using no component (B) in Examples 325 to 338 were obtained as Comparative Examples 335 to 348, and chemical mechanical polishing compositions using no component (A) in Examples 325 to 338 were obtained as Comparative Examples 349 to 362.

3.3.2. Evaluation Methods

[0182]

Evaluations were performed in the same manner as in the section “3.1.2. Evaluation Methods” above.

3.3.3. Evaluation Results

[0183]

The compositions of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions obtained in Comparative Examples 301 to 322, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 7 below. The compositions of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions obtained in Examples 301 to 324 and Comparative Examples 323 to 334, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 8 below. The compositions of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions obtained in Examples 325 to 338 and Comparative Examples 335 to 362, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 9 below.

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAdditionAddition
amountamountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)Abrasive grains(mass %)
Com-301Colloidal silica1
parative3022-0.01Colloidal silica1
ExamplePyridinemethanol
303Quinolinic acid0.005Colloidal silica1
304Quinolinic acid0.01Colloidal silica1
305Quinaldic acid0.01Colloidal silica1
306Histidine0.005Colloidal silica1
307Histidine0.01Colloidal silica1
308Arginine0.005Colloidal silica1
309Arginine0.01Colloidal silica1
310Aspartic acid0.005Colloidal silica1
311Aspartic acid0.01Colloidal silica1
312Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
313Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
314Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.1Colloidal silica1
315Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
316Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
317Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.1Colloidal silica1
3182-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.005Colloidal silica1
betaine
3192-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.01Colloidal silica1
betaine
3202-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.1Colloidal silica1
betaine
321Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
322Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
Evaluation result
CompositionsCharge
AdditiontransferCorrosion
amountpH adjustingresistanceobservationPolishingRC/(RA +
Oxidizing agent(mass %)agentpH(kΩ/cm2)resultrate (Å/min)RB) value
Comparative301Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad371
Example302Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid35Bad265
303Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad340
304Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad365
305Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad393
306Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid331Bad398
307Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid356Good354
308Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid335Bad310
309Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid356Good275
310Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad330
311Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad305
312Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid335Bad317
313Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3108Very Good284
314Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3280Very Good279
315Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3120Very Good319
316Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3172Very Good301
317Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3890Very Good310
318Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3150Very Good342
319Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3245Very Good271
320Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31000Very Good289
321Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad303
322Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad323

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAdditionAddition
amountamountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)Abrasive grains(mass %)
Exam-301Quinolinic acid0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.1Colloidal silica1
ple302Quinolinic acid0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
303Histidine0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
304Histidine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
305Arginine0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
306Arginine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
307Aspartic acid0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
308Aspartic acid0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
309Quinolinic acid0.005Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.1Colloidal silica1
310Quinolinic acid0.01Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
311Histidine0.005Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
312Histidine0.01Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
313Arginine0.005Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
314Arginine0.01Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
315Aspartic acid0.005Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
316Aspartic acid0.01Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
317Quinolinic acid0.0052-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.1Colloidal silica1
betaine
318Quinolinic acid0.012-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.01Colloidal silica1
betaine
319Histidine0.0052-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.005Colloidal silica1
betaine
320Histidine0.012-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.01Colloidal silica1
betaine
321Arginine0.0052-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.005Colloidal silica1
betaine
322Arginine0.012-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.01Colloidal silica1
betaine
323Aspartic acid0.0052-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.005Colloidal silica1
betaine
324Aspartic acid0.012-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.01Colloidal silica1
betaine
Com-3232-Pyridinemethanol0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
parative3242-Pyridinemethanol0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
Exam-3252-Pyridinemethanol0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
ple326Quinolinic acid0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
327Quinolinic acid0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
328Quinaldic acid0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
329Quinaldic acid0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
330Quinaldic acid0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
331Histidine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
332Arginine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
333Aspartic acid0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01Colloidal silica1
334Aspartic acid0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01Colloidal silica1
Evaluation result
CompositionsCharge
AdditiontransferCorrosion
amountpH adjustingresistanceobservationPolishingRC/(RA +
Oxidizing agent(mass %)agentpH(kΩ/cm2)resultrate (Å/min)RB) value
Example301Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3405Very Good3201.4
302Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3130Very Good3411.2
303Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3285Very Good3454.3
304Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3375Very Good3062.3
305Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3230Very Good3323.3
306Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3445Very Good3052.7
307Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3105Very Good3302.9
308Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3145Very Good3231.3
309Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31,055Very Good2801.2
310Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3761Very Good2894.4
311Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3250Very Good2911.7
312Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3383Very Good2951.7
313Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3255Very Good3201.6
314Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3400Very Good3171.8
315Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3130Very Good3531.1
316Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3309Very Good3051.8
317Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31,400Very Good2971.4
318Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3778Very Good2993.2
319Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3410Very Good3422.3
320Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3427Very Good2851.4
321Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3290Very Good3481.6
322Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3399Very Good2871.3
323Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3200Very Good3161.3
324Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid3265Very Good3001.1
Comparative323Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid367Good3340.6
Example324Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid35Bad3230.8
325Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid35Bad3010.8
326Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid32Bad2891
327Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid32Bad3091
328Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid351Bad3570.5
329Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad3540.5
330Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad3680.5
331Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid350Good3890.9
332Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid346Good3370.8
333Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad3090.5
334Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid31Bad3430.5

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAdditionAddition
amountamountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)Abrasive grains(mass %)
Comparative335Arginine0.005Colloidal silica1
Example336Arginine0.005Colloidal silica1
337Arginine0.005Colloidal silica1
338Arginine0.005Colloidal silica1
339Arginine0.005Colloidal silica1
340Arginine0.005Colloidal silica1
341Arginine0.005Colloidal silica1
342Arginine0.01Colloidal silica1
343Arginine0.01Colloidal silica1
344Arginine0.01Colloidal silica1
345Arginine0.01Colloidal silica1
346Arginine0.01Colloidal silica1
347Arginine0.01Colloidal silica1
348Arginine0.01Colloidal silica1
349Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
350Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
351Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
352Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
353Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
354Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
355Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
356Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
357Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
358Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
359Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
360Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
361Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
362Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
Example325Arginine0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
326Arginine0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
327Arginine0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
328Arginine0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
329Arginine0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
330Arginine0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
331Arginine0.005Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.005Colloidal silica1
332Arginine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
333Arginine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
334Arginine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
335Arginine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
336Arginine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
337Arginine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
338Arginine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01Colloidal silica1
Evaluation result
CompositionsCharge
AdditiontransferCorrosion
amountpH adjustingresistanceobservationPolishingRC/(RA +
Oxidizing agent(mass %)agentpH(kΩ/cm2)resultrate (Å/min)RB) value
Comparative335Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid39Bad421
Example336Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid33Bad470
337Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid119Bad301
338Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid222Bad318
339Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid430Good320
340Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid329Bad352
341Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid328Bad356
342Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid325Bad409
343Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid318Bad440
344Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid130Bad290
345Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid250Bad298
346Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid453Good313
347Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid356Good334
348Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid355Good349
349Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid353Good420
350Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid330Good458
351Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid128Good189
352Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid279Good309
353Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid489Good340
354Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid385Good325
355Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid379Good353
356Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid385Good389
357Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid357Good396
358Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid153Very Good226
359Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid2120Very Good289
360Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid4123Very Good291
361Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid3105Very Good320
362Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid3112Very Good329
Example325Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid3290Very Good3534.7
326Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid3220Very Good4216.7
327Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid1185Very Good1893.9
328Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid2395Very Good2303.9
329Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid4375Very Good2783.2
330Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid3320Very Good3212.8
331Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid3380Very Good3463.6
332Hydrogen peroxide2Maleic acid3420Very Good3393.8
333Hydrogen peroxide3Maleic acid3350Very Good3544.7
334Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid1240Very Good1892.9
335Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid2440Very Good2122.6
336Hydrogen peroxide1Maleic acid4430Very Good2892.4
337Hydrogen peroxide1Nitric acid3430Very Good3012.7
338Hydrogen peroxide1Phosphoric acid3445Very Good3332.7

[0184]

As apparent from Comparative Examples 302 to 322 and 335 to 362, none of the chemical mechanical polishing compositions each prepared using the component (A) or the component (B) alone except Comparative Examples 313 to 320 and 358 to 362 achieved satisfactory corrosion suppression. This is presumably because the charge transfer resistance value is 100 kΩ/cm2 or less, and hence the oxidation rate is high. In addition, also in each of Comparative Examples 323 to 334, satisfactory corrosion suppression was not achieved. This is presumably because the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is 1 or less, and hence a synergy effect does not act between the component (A) and the component (B).

[0185]

In the case of using lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine alone as the component (B), when its addition amount is 0.01 mass % or more and the amount of the oxidizing agent is 1 mass %, satisfactory corrosion suppression is achieved, but it is surmised that the effect is weakened when the addition amount is less than 0.01 mass % or the concentration of the oxidizing agent is increased.

[0186]

In contrast, in each of Examples 301 to 324, satisfactory corrosion suppression was achieved. This is presumably because in each of Examples 301 to 324, the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is more than 1, and a synergy effect acts between the component (A) and the component (B), and hence the charge transfer resistance value becomes more than 100 kΩ/cm2.

[0187]

In addition, as apparent from Table 9, in each of Examples 325 to 338, satisfactory corrosion suppression was achieved. This is presumably because, irrespective of the addition amounts of additives, the addition amount of the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value, the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is more than 1, and a synergy effect acts between the component (A) and the component (B), and hence the charge transfer resistance value becomes more than 100 kΩ/cm2. Thus, it has been demonstrated that when the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances is more than 1, a satisfactory tungsten corrosion suppression ability is expressed irrespective of the addition amounts of the additives, the addition amount of the oxidizing agent, the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value. In particular, as demonstrated in Comparative Examples 356 and 357, when lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine was used alone, the result was that the corrosion-suppressing effect decreased with an increase in amount of the oxidizing agent, but as demonstrated in Examples 325, 326, 332, and 333, through the combined use with arginine serving as the component (A), corrosion suppression was possible even when the amount of the oxidizing agent was increased.

3.4. Examples of Cleaning Composition

3.4.1. Preparation of Cleaning Composition

Comparative Example 401

[0188]

Components shown in Table 10 were loaded into a container made of polyethylene, and ion-exchanged water and maleic acid serving as a pH adjusting agent were added so as to achieve a total amount of constituent components of 100 mass %/o and adjust pH to 3. The mixture was stirred for 15 minutes to provide a cleaning composition of Comparative Example 401.

Comparative Examples 402 to 419

[0189]

On the basis of Comparative Example 401, cleaning compositions each containing the component (A) or the component (B) shown in Table 10 were prepared, and defined as Comparative Examples 402 to 419.

Comparative Examples 420 to 440

[0190]

On the basis of Comparative Example 401, cleaning compositions each containing the component (A) and the component (B) shown in Table 11 were prepared, and defined as Comparative Examples 420 to 440.

Examples 401 to 425

[0191]

On the basis of Comparative Example 401, cleaning compositions each containing the component (A) and the component (B) shown in Table 12 were prepared, and defined as Examples 401 to 425.

Comparative Examples 441 to 454 and Examples 426 to 435

[0192]

Next, in accordance with compositions shown in Table 13, on the basis of Examples 410, 412, and 419, various cleaning compositions were prepared by changing the addition amounts of the component (A) and the component (B), the kind of the pH adjusting agent, and the pH value, and were defined as Comparative Examples 441 to 454 and Examples 426 to 435.

3.4.2. Evaluation Methods

3.4.2.1. Evaluation of Charge Transfer Resistance

[0193]

Charge transfer resistances were evaluated in the same manner as in the section 3.1.2.1, above except that the evaluation was performed at 45° C. using each obtained cleaning composition.

3.4.2.2. Evaluation of Corrosion Observation

[0194]

Corrosion was observed in the same manner as in the section 3.1.2.2, above except that the evaluation was performed at 45° C. using each obtained cleaning composition. Evaluation criteria for the corrosion are as described below.

[0195]

Very Good: A case in which no change in shape of the surface due to corrosion is found as compared to that before the immersion is determined as a particularly satisfactory result.

[0196]

Good: A case in which a site corroded as compared to that before the immersion and a non-corroded site are mixed is determined as a satisfactory result.

[0197]

Bad: A case in which the entire surface is corroded as compared to that before the immersion is determined as a poor result.

3.4.2.3. Defect Evaluation

[0198]

Tungsten cut wafers each having a size of 3 cm×3 cm subjected to chemical mechanical polishing treatment in advance using the chemical mechanical polishing composition of Comparative Example 119 by the method of the section 3.1.2.3, above were prepared. Five sites of each of the cut wafers were observed at a frame size of 10 μm using Dimension FastScan, which was a scanning atomic force microscope (AFM) manufactured by Bruker Corporation. Only those tungsten cut wafers that were found to have a flat surface having an average value of the arithmetic average roughnesses of the five sites of 0.1 nm or less were used for defect evaluation. Each of the cut wafers was subjected to immersion treatment in the cleaning composition in the same manner as in the section 3.4.2.2, above, and five sites were observed at a frame size of 10 μm using the AFM. For the resultant five images, the total number of deposits each having a height of 2.0 nm or more counted with image analysis software was defined as the number of defects. Evaluation criteria are as described below.

[0199]

Good: A number of defects of less than 500 is determined as a satisfactory result.

[0200]

Bad: A number of defects of 500 or more is determined as a poor result.

3.4.3. Evaluation Results

[0201]

The compositions of the cleaning compositions obtained in Comparative Examples 401 to 419, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 10 below. The compositions of the cleaning compositions obtained in Comparative Examples 420 to 440, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 11 below. The compositions of the cleaning compositions obtained in Examples 401 to 425, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 12 below.

[0202]

The compositions of the cleaning compositions obtained in Comparative Examples 441 to 454 and Examples 426 to 435, and their evaluation results are shown in Table 13 below.

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAddition
amountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)
Com-401
parative402Piperazine0.01
Example403N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01
404N,N′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01
405Histidine0.01
406Arginine0.01
407Aspartic acid0.01
4082-Pyridinemethanol0.01
409Quinolinic acid0.01
410Quinaldic acid0.01
411Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01
4122-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium0.01
betaine
413Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
414Dipotassium alkenylsuccinate0.01
415Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
416Laurlsulfuric acid ester0.01
417Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01
4182,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-oligoethylene glycol0.01
419Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01
Evaluation result
Number of defects
(defects)
CompositionsCharge transferCorrosionGood: less than 500RC/(RA +
pH adjusting agentpHresistance (kΩ/cm2)observation resultBad: 500 or lessRB) value
Comparative401Maleic acid3100BadBad
Example402Maleic acid3120BadBad
403Maleic acid3890GoodBad
404Maleic acid33,600Very GoodBad
405Maleic acid3410GoodGood
406Maleic acid3550GoodBad
407Maleic acid390BadBad
408Maleic acid3210BadBad
409Maleic acid390BadBad
410Maleic acid380BadBad
411Maleic acid33,500Very GoodGood
412Maleic acid33,430Very GoodBad
413Maleic acid36,540Very GoodBad
414Maleic acid3100BadBad
415Maleic acid3110BadGood
416Maleic acid3110BadGood
417Maleic acid3120BadBad
418Maleic acid3130BadBad
419Maleic acid3110BadGood

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAddition
amountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)
Comparative420Piperazine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
Example421Piperazine0.012,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-oligoethylene glycol0.01
422N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
423N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.012,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-oligoethylene glycol0.01
424N,N,′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
425N,N,′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.012,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-oligoethylene glycol0.01
426Histidine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01
427Histidine0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01
428Arginine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01
429Arginine0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01
430Aspartic acid0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
431Aspartic acid0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01
432Aspartic acid0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01
4332-Pyridinemethanol0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
4342-Pyridinemethanol0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
4352-Pyridinemethanol0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01
436Quinolinic acid0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
437Quinolinic acid0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01
438Quinaldic acid0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
439Quinaldic acid0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
440Quinaldic acid0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01
Evaluation result
Number of defects
(defects)
CompositionsCharge tranferCorrosionGood: less than 500RC/(RA +
pH adjusting agentpHresistance (kΩ/cm2)observation resultBad: 500 or lessRB) value
Comparative420Maleic acid3420BadBad0.1
Example421Maleic acid3120BadBad0.5
422Maleic acid3590BadBad0.1
423Maleic acid3380BadBad0.4
424Maleic acid3420BadBad0.04
425Maleic acid3300BadBad0.1
426Maleic acid3310GoodGood0.6
427Maleic acid3300GoodGood0.6
428Maleic acid3450GoodBad0.7
429Maleic acid3430GoodGood0.7
430Maleic acid3120BadGood0.6
431Maleic acid3120BadBad0.6
432Maleic acid390BadGood0.5
433Maleic acid3600GoodBad0.1
434Maleic acid3220BadBad0.7
435Maleic acid3230BadBad0.7
436Maleic acid3180BadBad0.9
437Maleic acid3190BadBad0.9
438Maleic acid390BadBad0.01
439Maleic acid390BadBad0.5
440Maleic acid380BadBad0.4

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAddition
amountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)
Example401Piperazine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
402N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Dipotassium alkenylsuccinate0.01
403N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
404N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01
405N-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01
406N,N,′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Dipotassium alkenylsuccinate0.01
407N,N,′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
408N,N,′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Octyl phosphoric acid ester0.01
409N,N,′-Bis(3-propylamino)piperazine0.01Polyacrylic acid (JURYMER AC-10L)0.01
410Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
411Arginine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
412Histidine0.01Laurylsulfuric acid ester0.01
413Arginine0.01Laurylsulfuric acid ester0.01
414Quinolinic acid0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
415Histidine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
416Arginine0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
417Aspartic acid0.01Lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine0.01
418Quinolinic acid0.01Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01
419Histidine0.01Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01
420Arginine0.01Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01
421Aspartic acid0.01Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.01
422Quinolinic acid0.012-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium betaine0.01
423Histidine0.012-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium betaine0.01
424Arginine0.012-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium betaine0.01
425Aspartic acid0.012-Lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium betaine0.01
Evaluation result
Number of defects
(defects)
CompositionsCharge tranferCorrosionGood: less than 500RC/(RA +
pH adjusting agentpHresistance (kΩ/cm2)observation resultBad: 500 or lessRB) value
Example401Maleic acid313,400Very GoodGood58
402Maleic acid332,100Very GoodBad32
403Maleic acid325,800Very GoodGood26
404Maleic acid349,000Very GoodBad49
405Maleic acid37,000Very GoodGood7
406Maleic acid310,900Very GoodBad3
407Maleic acid340,300Very GoodGood11
408Maleic acid330,700Very GoodBad8
409Maleic acid320,000Very GoodBad5
410Maleic acid323,600Very GoodGood45
411Maleic acid320,500Very GoodGood31
412Maleic acid321,000Very GoodGood40
413Maleic acid323,900Very GoodGood36
414Maleic acid38,050Very GoodBad1.2
415Maleic acid38,000Very GoodGood1.2
416Maleic acid38,590Very GoodBad1.2
417Maleic acid311,200Very GoodBad1.7
418Maleic acid37,700Very GoodBad2.1
419Maleic acid38,400Very GoodGood2.1
420Maleic acid321,200Very GoodGood5.2
421Maleic acid320,500Very GoodGood5.7
422Maleic acid319,800Very GoodBad5.6
423Maleic acid312,000Very GoodGood3.1
424Maleic acid320,000Very GoodBad5.0
425Maleic acid323,700Very GoodBad6.7

[0000]

Compositions
AdditionAddition
amountamount
Component (A)(mass %)Component (B)(mass %)
Comparative441Histidine0.002
Example442Histidine0.05
443Histidine0.01
444Histidine0.01
445Histidine0.01
446Histidine0.01
447Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
448Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.02
449Laurylsulfuric acid ester0.002
450Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.002
451Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
452Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
453Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
454Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
Example426Histidine0.002Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.002
427Histidine0.002Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.02
428Histidine0.05Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.002
429Histidine0.05Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.02
430Histidine0.002Laurylsulfuric acid ester0.002
431Histidine0.002Laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine0.002
432Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
433Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
434Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
435Histidine0.01Potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate0.01
Evaluation result
Number of defects
(defects)
CompositionsCharge tranferCorrosionGood: less than 500RC/(RA +
pH adjusting agentpHresistance (kΩ/cm2)observation resultBad: 500 or lessRB) value
Comparative441Maleic acid3180GoodBad
Example442Maleic acid3550GoodGood
443Maleic acid585BadGood
444Maleic acid2.2230BadBad
445Phosphoric acid3420GoodGood
446Nitric acid3410GoodGood
447Maleic acid3100BadBad
448Maleic acid395BadBad
449Maleic acid3100BadBad
450Maleic acid3950GoodBad
451Maleic acid528BadBad
452Maleic acid2.250BadBad
453Phosphoric acid3100BatBad
454Nitric acid360BadBad
Example426Maleic acid32,240Very GoodGood8
427Maleic acid33,200Very GoodGood12
428Maleic acid312,900Very GoodGood20
429Maleic acid343,400Very GoodGood67
430Maleic acid31,690Very GoodGood6
431Maleic acid32,300Very GoodGood2
432Maleic acid51,120Very GoodGood10
433Maleic acid2.210,800Very GoodGood39
434Phosphoric acid318,900Very GoodGood36
435Nitric acid320,100Very GoodGood43

[0203]

As apparent from Comparative Examples 401 to 419, the results of the tungsten corrosion evaluation using the compositions each prepared using the component (A) or the component (B) alone were that satisfactory corrosion suppression was not achieved in each of the comparative examples except Comparative Examples 404 and 411 to 413. This is presumably because the charge transfer resistance value of tungsten is 1,000 kΩ/cm2 or less, and hence the oxidation rate is high.

[0204]

In addition, as apparent from Comparative Examples 420 to 440, and Comparative Examples 441 to 454, also in each of the cases of using the compositions each containing both the component (A) and the component (B), satisfactory corrosion suppression was not achieved. This is presumably because the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances as defined in claim 1 is 1 or less, and a synergy effect does not act between the component (A) and the component (B).

[0205]

In contrast, as apparent from Examples 401 to 425, in each of the cases of containing both the component (A) and the component (B), satisfactory corrosion suppression was achieved. This is presumably because the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) of the charge transfer resistances as defined in claim 1 was 1 or more. Thus, Examples 401 to 425 have demonstrated that when a synergy effect acts between the component (A) and the component (B) to increase the charge transfer resistance value to 1,000 kΩ/cm2 or more, tungsten corrosion suppression is possible.

[0206]

In addition, also in each of Examples 426 to 435, satisfactory corrosion suppression was achieved. This is presumably because the relational expression RC/(RA+RB) using the charge transfer resistances RA, RB, and RC as defined in claim 1 was 1 or more, and a synergy effect acted between the component (A) and the component (B) to increase the charge transfer resistance value to 1,000 kΩ/cm2 or more. Thus, Examples 426 to 435 have demonstrated that a satisfactory tungsten corrosion suppression ability is expressed irrespective of the concentrations of the component (A) and the component (B), the pH, and the kind of the pH adjusting agent.

[0207]

The invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, and various modifications may be made thereto. The invention encompasses substantially the same configurations as the configurations described in the embodiments (e.g., configurations having the same functions, methods, and results, or configurations having the same objects and effects). In addition, the invention encompasses configurations obtained by replacing non-essential parts of the configurations described in the embodiments with other configurations. In addition, the invention encompasses configurations exhibiting the same action and effect or configurations capable of achieving the same objects as those of the configurations described in the embodiments. In addition, the invention encompasses configurations obtained by adding known technologies to the configurations described in the embodiments.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

[0208]

10 . . . silicon substrate, 12 . . . silicon oxide film, 14 . . . tungsten film, 20 . . . wiring depression, 42 . . . slurry supply nozzle, 44 . . . slurry (chemical mechanical polishing composition), 46 . . . abrasive cloth, 48 . . . turntable, 50 . . . semiconductor substrate, 52 . . . carrier head, 54 . . . water supply nozzle, 56 . . . dresser, 100 . . . object to be treated, 200 . . . chemical mechanical polishing apparatus



[0000]

Provided is a treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing, for treating an object to be treated including a wiring layer containing a metal, the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing containing: (A) a nitrogen-containing compound; (B) at least one kind of compound selected from the group consisting of a surfactant and polyacrylic acid; and (D) a pH adjusting agent, in which in terms of electrode charge transfer resistance value obtained by AC impedance measurement using the metal for an electrode, a sum of electrode charge transfer resistance values RA+RB in aqueous solutions each containing the component (A) or (B) and the component (D), and an electrode charge transfer resistance value RC in an aqueous solution containing the components (A), (B), and (D) have a relationship of RC/(RA+RB)>1.

[00000]



1: A treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing, comprising:

(A) a nitrogen-containing compound;

(B) at least one compound selected from the group consisting of a surfactant and polyacrylic acid; and

(D) a pH adjusting agent,

wherein in terms of electrode charge transfer resistance value by Ω/cm2 obtained by AC impedance measurement using a metal, which is contained in a wiring layer of an object to be treated by the treatment composition, as an electrode by

bonding an insulating tape to a central 1 cm×1 cm portion of a metal wafer cut to 1 cm×3 cm,

attaching an electrode clip to an upper 1 cm×1 cm exposed area of the metal wafer,

connecting the metal wafer to a measurement apparatus with a controlled AC voltage,

immersing a lower 1 cm×1 cm exposed area of the metal wafer in an aqueous solution for 5 minutes,

applying an AC voltage having an amplitude of 5 mV and a frequency of from 1,500 Hz to 0.5 Hz changing from a higher frequency to a lower frequency to obtain values for a real part and an imaginary part of a resistance value,

plotting the imaginary part on a vertical axis and the real part on a horizontal axis, and

analyzing the resultant semicircular plot with AC impedance analysis software,

a value (RA+RB) obtained by summing up an electrode charge transfer resistance value (RA) in an aqueous solution containing the component (A) and the pH adjusting agent (D), and an electrode charge transfer resistance value (RB) in an aqueous solution containing the component (B) and the pH adjusting agent (D), and an electrode charge transfer resistance value (RC) in an aqueous solution containing the component (A), the component (B), and the pH adjusting agent (D) satisfy a relationship of RC/(RA+RB)>1.

2: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 1, wherein the nitrogen-containing compound (A) comprises at least one compound selected from the group consisting of a compound represented by formula (1), a compound represented by formula (2), and a compound represented by formula (3):

where R1 and R2 each independently represent a hydrogen atom or an organic group comprising 1 to 10 carbon atoms;

where R3 represents a functional group selected from the group consisting of a hydrogen atom, an organic group having comprising 2 to 10 carbon atoms and a nitrogen atom, and an organic group comprising 1 to 10 carbon atoms and a carboxyl group; and

where one or more of R4 to R7 each independently represent a carboxyl group comprising 1 to 3 carbon atoms, and others of R4 to R7 each represent a hydrogen atom.

3: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 2,

wherein the component (A) comprises the compound represented by the formula (1), and

wherein the component (B) comprises an anionic surfactant or a polyacrylic acid.

4: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 3, wherein the anionic surfactant comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of potassium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, a dipotassium alkenylsuccinate, and octyl phosphoric acid ester.

5: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 2,

wherein the component (A) comprises the compound represented by the formula (2) in which R3 represents an organic group comprising 2 to 10 carbon atoms and a nitrogen atom, and

wherein the component (B) comprises a surfactant comprising a sulfo group.

6: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 5, wherein the surfactant comprising a sulfo group comprises an alkylbenzenesulfonic acid or a salt thereof.

7: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 2,

wherein the component (A) comprises the compound represented by the formula (2) or the compound represented by the formula (3), and

wherein the component (B) comprises a betaine-based surfactant comprising a carboxyl group.

8: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 7, wherein the betaine-based surfactant comprising a carboxyl group comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of a compound represented by formula (4), a compound represented by formula (5), and a compound represented by formula (6):

where R8 to R10 each independently represent a hydrocarbon group each comprising 1 to 15 carbon atoms, and R11 represents a hydrocarbon group comprising 1 to 5 carbon atoms;

where R12 and R13 each independently represent a hydrogen atom, a hydrocarbon group comprising 5 to 20 carbon atoms, an organic group comprising 5 to 20 carbon atoms and an amide group, an organic group comprising 5 to 20 carbon atoms and an amino group, an organic group comprising 5 to 20 carbon atoms and an imide group, an organic group comprising 1 to 10 carbon atoms and a carboxyl group, or an organic group comprising 1 to 10 carbon atoms and a hydroxyl group, and R14 represents a hydrocarbon group comprising 1 to 5 carbon atoms; and

where R15 and R16 each independently represent a hydrocarbon group comprising 1 to 20 carbon atoms, or an organic group comprising 1 to 10 carbon atoms and a hydroxyl group, and R17 represents a hydrocarbon group comprising 1 to 5 carbon atoms.

9: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 8,

wherein the component (A) comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of quinolinic acid, histidine, arginine, and aspartic acid, and

wherein the component (B) comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of lauryldimethylaminoacetic acid betaine, laurylaminodipropionic acid betaine, and 2-lauryl-N-carboxymethyl-N-hydroxyethylimidazolinium betaine.

10: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 1, wherein the electrode charge transfer resistance value (RC) is more than 100 kΩ/cm2.

11: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 1, wherein the metal is tungsten.

12: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 1, further comprising an oxidizing agent (C).

13: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 12, wherein the oxidizing agent (C) is hydrogen peroxide or ammonium persulfate.

14: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 1, wherein the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing is a cleaning composition for cleaning the object to be treated.

15: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 1, further comprising abrasive grains (E).

16: The treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing according to claim 15, wherein the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing is a chemical mechanical polishing composition for polishing the object to be treated.

17: A chemical mechanical polishing method, comprising

polishing an object with the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing of claim 16.

18: A cleaning method, comprising

cleaning an object with the treatment composition for chemical mechanical polishing of claim 14.

19. (canceled)